Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cosmos DB and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 8.3, allowing for complex relationships and graph structures, while Azure Cosmos DB, with a score of 7.7, is noted for its flexibility but may not provide the same depth in graph-specific modeling.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Cosmos DB shines in scalability, achieving a score of 9.3, which is significantly higher than Neo4j's score of 7.9, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring rapid scaling and high availability.
- G2 users highlight that Neo4j's query language is highly intuitive, scoring 8.6, which facilitates easier data retrieval for graph-based queries, whereas Azure Cosmos DB's query language, scoring 7.9, is seen as less specialized for graph queries.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Cosmos DB offers superior security features, with a score of 8.9, including robust role-based authorization and encryption, compared to Neo4j's lower score of 6.8, indicating a potential gap in security capabilities.
- Reviewers say that Neo4j provides a strong built-in search functionality with a score of 7.0, which is beneficial for graph data, while Azure Cosmos DB's built-in search feature scores higher at 8.0, making it more effective for general data queries.
- Users report that both products have their strengths in data replication, with Neo4j scoring 8.1 and Azure Cosmos DB at 8.7, but Azure Cosmos DB is often preferred for its multi-region replication capabilities, which are crucial for global applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableNeo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableNeo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
8.5
73
Ease of Use
8.2
48
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.2
46
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
47
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Security
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.6
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.4
15
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
Availability
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
Security
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
5.6
6
Not enough data
Data Management
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cosmos DB and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Graph Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
