Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Container Registry and Sonatype Nexus Repository 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Octopus Deploy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Container Registry
Star Rating
(36)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Container RegistrySonatype Nexus Repository
Star Rating
(23)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Sonatype Nexus RepositorySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Container Registry excels in integration capabilities, scoring 9.0, which allows for seamless connections with Azure services, enhancing the overall workflow. In contrast, Sonatype Nexus Repository, while still strong, has a slightly lower integration score, which some users feel limits its flexibility in multi-cloud environments.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Container Registry's package management feature scores 8.8, providing robust support for Docker images and Helm charts, making it a preferred choice for teams heavily invested in containerization. On the other hand, Sonatype Nexus Repository, while offering solid package management, is often highlighted for its extensive support for various package formats, which some users find more versatile for diverse development needs.
- G2 users indicate that Azure Container Registry's vulnerability checks score 7.5, which some reviewers feel could be improved, especially in comparison to Sonatype Nexus Repository, which has a more comprehensive approach to security scanning, earning it higher marks in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Container Registry's ease of use is rated at 9.0, making it user-friendly for teams new to container management. In contrast, Sonatype Nexus Repository, with a score of 8.7, is noted for its slightly steeper learning curve, particularly for users unfamiliar with its extensive feature set.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Container Registry's automation features score 8.7, which helps streamline CI/CD processes effectively. However, Sonatype Nexus Repository shines in rollback capabilities, scoring 8.2, which users appreciate for its ability to revert to previous versions quickly, a critical feature for maintaining stability in production environments.
- Users say that Azure Container Registry has received positive feedback for its product direction, scoring 9.5, indicating a strong commitment to evolving with user needs. Conversely, Sonatype Nexus Repository's product direction score of 7.4 has led some users to express concerns about the pace of innovation and feature updates.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Container Registry
No pricing availableSonatype Nexus Repository
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Container Registry
No trial information availableSonatype Nexus Repository
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
33
9.2
17
Ease of Use
9.0
32
8.7
17
Ease of Setup
8.8
8
8.3
8
Ease of Admin
8.1
7
8.8
8
Quality of Support
8.9
30
8.3
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
7
8.1
6
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
32
7.4
18
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Management
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Container Registry and Sonatype Nexus Repository are categorized as Container Registry
Unique Categories
Azure Container Registry has no unique categories
Sonatype Nexus Repository is categorized as Repository Management and Build Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Container Registry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
40.0%
Information Services
5.7%
Consumer Goods
5.7%
Computer Software
5.7%
Manufacturing
2.9%
Other
40.0%
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Computer Software
23.8%
Banking
9.5%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Retail
4.8%
Other
23.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Azure Container Registry used for?
1 Comment
AS
Azure Container Registry or ACR used to store container images. These images can be used to create container. It has feature like version control for you...Read more
Azure Container Registry has no more discussions with answers
What is Nexus software used for?
1 Comment
NP
Nexus Repository Manager helps store application files. It is similar to Github, but is accessible on the company's intranet, rather than on the internet,...Read more
Sonatype Nexus Repository has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
