Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Application Gateway and Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Application Gateway
Star Rating
(158)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Application GatewayImperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Star Rating
(41)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Application Gateway excels in its Application-Layer Controls with a score of 9.4, providing robust features for managing web traffic, while Imperva WAF follows closely with a score of 9.3, indicating strong but slightly less comprehensive controls.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Application Gateway's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.4, which some users find a bit challenging compared to Imperva WAF's higher score of 9.2, suggesting a more user-friendly installation process.
- G2 users highlight that Imperva WAF shines in Quality of Support, scoring 9.2, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Azure Application Gateway has a slightly lower score of 8.5.
- Users on G2 report that both products perform well in Performance and Reliability, but Imperva WAF edges out with a score of 9.4, indicating a more consistent performance under load compared to Azure's score of 9.2.
- Reviewers say that Azure Application Gateway offers strong Security Monitoring capabilities with a score of 9.4, which users appreciate for its proactive threat detection, while Imperva WAF's score of 9.3 still reflects solid security features.
- Users report that both products have good API / Integrations capabilities, but Imperva WAF's score of 9.2 suggests a more extensive range of integrations, making it easier for users to connect with other tools and platforms compared to Azure's score of 8.8.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Application Gateway
No pricing availableImperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Application Gateway
No trial information availableImperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
101
9.5
36
Ease of Use
8.5
101
9.3
35
Ease of Setup
8.3
68
9.1
18
Ease of Admin
8.6
65
9.1
17
Quality of Support
8.5
99
9.0
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
64
9.1
17
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
94
9.3
33
Features by Category
Analysis
9.1
11
9.3
28
8.6
11
8.9
28
9.4
11
9.3
29
Controls
9.4
11
9.2
26
9.2
11
9.0
29
9.4
11
9.3
30
Functionality
8.8
11
9.1
26
8.9
11
9.2
28
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
9.0
5
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Application Gateway and Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) are categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
Azure Application Gateway is categorized as Load Balancing
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Application Gateway
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Computer Software
11.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Banking
4.4%
Other
49.3%
Information Technology and Services
38.5%
Retail
12.8%
Banking
10.3%
Financial Services
5.1%
Computer & Network Security
5.1%
Other
28.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
dvsdvsdvsdvsdvsd
1 Comment
EA
ccczzzRead more
What is the best way I can use App gateway for multiple applications ?
1 Comment
AD
You'd configure your applications to all live under separate domains, subdomains or paths behind your application gateway.
Consider having WordPress CMS,...Read more
Azure Application Gateway has no more discussions with answers
Is imperva a Web application firewall?
1 Comment
VM
Yes, Imperva is a well-known provider of web application firewall (WAF) solutions. Imperva offers a Web Application Firewall product, known as Imperva WAF,...Read more
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
