Azure Application Gateway vs Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) overall.
Reviewers felt that Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) meets the needs of their business better than Azure Application Gateway.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) over Azure Application Gateway.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Application Gateway
No pricing available
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Application Gateway
No trial information available
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
102
9.5
36
Ease of Use
8.5
102
9.3
35
Ease of Setup
8.3
69
9.1
18
Ease of Admin
8.6
65
9.1
17
Quality of Support
8.5
100
9.0
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What is the best way I can use App gateway for multiple applications ?
1 Comment
AD
You'd configure your applications to all live under separate domains, subdomains or paths behind your application gateway.
Consider having WordPress CMS,...Read more
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) Discussions
Is imperva a Web application firewall?
1 Comment
VM
Yes, Imperva is a well-known provider of web application firewall (WAF) solutions. Imperva offers a Web Application Firewall product, known as Imperva WAF,...Read more
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.