Link copied to clipboard # Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/azure-application-gateway/f5-big-ip-local-traffic-manager-ltm/export.csv) Azure Application GatewayF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Azure Application Gateway** No pricing available **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Azure Application Gateway** $$$$$ **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** $$$$$ Average Discount **Azure Application Gateway** 17% **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Azure Application Gateway** 6 months Based on 100 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)**6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Azure Application Gateway** 6 months Based on 100 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)**6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Azure Application Gateway** Ease of Use (6) Scalability (5) Complexity (5) Cost Issues (3) **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** Configuration Ease (1) Features (1) Debugging Issues (1) Difficult Setup (1) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Azure Application Gateway** **8.8** /10 Based on 104 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **9.2** /10 Based on 21 responses Ease of Use **Azure Application Gateway** **8.5** /10 Based on 104 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **9.0** /10 Based on 22 responses Ease of Setup **Azure Application Gateway** **8.2** /10 Based on 71 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **8.8** /10 Based on 17 responses Ease of Admin **Azure Application Gateway** **8.6** /10 Based on 67 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **8.9** /10 Based on 16 responses Quality of Support **Azure Application Gateway** **8.5** /10 Based on 102 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **8.7** /10 Based on 20 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Azure Application Gateway** **8.8** /10 Based on 66 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **9.0** /10 Based on 16 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Azure Application Gateway** **8.9** /10 Based on 97 responses **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)** **9.4** /10 Based on 19 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Web Application Firewall (WAF) **9.0** /10 Based on 15 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 23.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 33.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 43.2% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 23.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 33.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 43.2% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 9.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 19.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 71.0% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 9.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 19.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 71.0% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Azure Application Gateway](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_f176b4154a751d10150daa67a57b7dc5/azure-application-gateway.jpg "Azure Application Gateway")](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-application-gateway/reviews) Azure Application Gateway Information Technology and Services 23.0% Computer Software 10.8% Computer & Network Security 7.9% Banking 5.0% Hospital & Health Care 4.3% Other 48.9% [![F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_57a879ab5b127c9cc00f273c01d09a36/f5-big-ip-local-traffic-manager-ltm.png "F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)")](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-big-ip-local-traffic-manager-ltm/reviews) F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Information Technology and Services 23.3% Banking 16.7% Financial Services 10.0% Telecommunications 6.7% Computer & Network Security 6.7% Other 36.7% Alternatives **Azure Application Gateway Alternatives** ![F5 NGINX](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/62010ad6d5b954f5a6a5bdaf40a5d2b7/f5-nginx.svg "F5 NGINX") [ Nginx ](/products/f5-nginx/reviews) ![NetScaler](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/cfa232d9f9881e5c95c23d2a5b2d67a2/netscaler.svg "NetScaler") [ NetScaler ](/products/netscaler/reviews) ![HAProxy](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7b4d7d3f13ff9a655c3e07b1ab59128a/haproxy.svg "HAProxy") [ HAProxy ](/products/haproxy/reviews) ![Cloudflare Application Security and Performance](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b2231a414cb9f3f7c194f65af32b723e/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance.png "Cloudflare Application Security and Performance") [ Cloudflare Application... ](/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews) **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Alternatives** ![Progress Kemp LoadMaster](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c78ac0b6d20134e5a20f999092ab6cf7/progress-kemp-loadmaster.svg "Progress Kemp LoadMaster") [ Progress Kemp LoadMaster ](/products/progress-kemp-loadmaster/reviews) ![Azure Traffic Manager](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_f176b4154a751d10150daa67a57b7dc5/azure-traffic-manager.jpg "Azure Traffic Manager") [ Azure Traffic Manager ](/products/azure-traffic-manager/reviews) ![NetScaler](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/cfa232d9f9881e5c95c23d2a5b2d67a2/netscaler.svg "NetScaler") [ NetScaler ](/products/netscaler/reviews) ![HAProxy](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7b4d7d3f13ff9a655c3e07b1ab59128a/haproxy.svg "HAProxy") [ HAProxy ](/products/haproxy/reviews) ## Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic... FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...? Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager differ most clearly in their reviewer-cited strengths, with Azure Application Gateway favored for ease of use and scalability, while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is recognized for advanced traffic management and reliability. | [Azure Application Gateway](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-application-gateway/reviews) | [F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-big-ip-local-traffic-manager-ltm/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.4/5 (162 reviews) | 4.5/5 (41 reviews) | | Enterprise | Enterprise | | 8.2 | 8.5 | | 8.5 | 8.5 | | Ease of Use (6 all-time mentions) | Advanced Traffic Management | ### How do the pricing models of Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic... compare? Reviewers consider Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to be closely matched on value, with no material difference in price satisfaction scores. - **Azure Application Gateway:** In recent reviews, several reviewers cite cost efficiency and a pay-as-you-go model as benefits, but also mention that the service can be expensive, especially for high-traffic scenarios. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager:** Reviewers note that the platform is expensive and can be a heavy financial burden, particularly for smaller environments, but recognize its advanced features as justification for the cost in enterprise use cases. ### What are the best alternatives to Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...? The top 3 alternatives to Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager are Nginx, NetScaler, and Progress Kemp LoadMaster. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Azure Application Gateway](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-application-gateway/reviews) | 4.4/5 (162 reviews) | Enterprise | In recent reviews, several reviewers cite cost efficiency and scalability, but also mention high costs for advanced features. | Ease of Use (6 all-time mentions) | | [F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-big-ip-local-traffic-manager-ltm/reviews) | 4.5/5 (41 reviews) | Enterprise | Reviewers note the platform is expensive but highlight advanced traffic management as a key value. | Advanced Traffic Management | | [Nginx](https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx/reviews) | 4.6/5 (113 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — | | [NetScaler](https://www.g2.com/products/netscaler/reviews) | 4.4/5 (85 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — | | [Progress Kemp LoadMaster](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-kemp-loadmaster/reviews) | 4.7/5 (214 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — | ### Which Load Balancing features should I prioritize when comparing Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...? Buyers should prioritize scalability, security, ease of use, advanced traffic management, and cost efficiency when comparing Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager. - **Scalability:** Azure Application Gateway has 5 all-time mentions for scalability; F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is recognized for handling high traffic environments in recent reviews. - **Security:** Azure Application Gateway is frequently cited for its built-in firewall and security features; F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is noted for SSL offloading and security capabilities. - **Ease of Use:** Azure Application Gateway has 6 all-time mentions for ease of use; F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is described as user-friendly in recent reviews. - **Advanced Traffic Management:** F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is highlighted for advanced features like iRules and granular control; Azure Application Gateway is noted for URL-based routing and session affinity. - **Cost Efficiency:** Azure Application Gateway has 4 all-time mentions for cost efficiency; F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is described as expensive but justified for enterprise needs. ### What are the pros and cons of Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...? Azure Application Gateway's headline strength is ease of use and scalability, while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is recognized for advanced traffic management and reliability. - **Azure Application Gateway strengths:** Ease of use (6 all-time mentions), scalability (5 all-time mentions), cost efficiency (4 all-time mentions), integrations (4 all-time mentions), and advanced security features. - **Azure Application Gateway trade-offs:** Complexity (5 all-time mentions), high cost (3 all-time mentions), learning difficulty (3 all-time mentions), and limited to HTTP/HTTPS protocols. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager strengths:** Advanced traffic management, reliability, security, and user-friendly GUI in recent reviews. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager trade-offs:** Expensive (recent reviews), steep learning curve, and dated web UI. ### Is Azure Application Gateway or F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic... better for small businesses? Azure Application Gateway is better suited for small businesses, as reviewers highlight its ease of use and scalability for organizations without large infrastructure needs. - **Azure Application Gateway:** Largest segment is Enterprise, but recent reviews recommend it for small organizations due to minimal infrastructure requirements and pay-as-you-go pricing. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager:** Largest segment is Enterprise, and reviewers note its high cost and advanced features are best justified in large-scale or enterprise environments. ### Which Load Balancing platform has better integrations? Azure Application Gateway is favored for integrations, with more reviewer-cited mentions and positive sentiment around integration capabilities. - **Azure Application Gateway:** Integrations are cited in 4 all-time mentions, with reviewers highlighting ease of integration with other platforms and Microsoft products. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager:** Reviewers mention API documentation and integration with automation platforms, but no all-time mention count is supplied. ### How do Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic... compare on customer support? Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager are rated equally on Quality of Support, both scoring 8.5, indicating parity in reviewer satisfaction. - **Azure Application Gateway:** Reviewers frequently mention responsive customer support and technical assistance, with 2 all-time mentions for customer support. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager:** Reviewers describe good customer service and support, with several noting helpful assistance during deployment and troubleshooting. ### Which is easier to implement, Azure Application Gateway or F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic...? F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager has a slight edge in Ease of Setup, scoring 8.5 versus Azure Application Gateway's 8.2, but the difference is below the materiality threshold, indicating near parity. - **Azure Application Gateway:** Reviewers describe the setup as generally straightforward but note some complexity and a learning curve, especially for advanced configurations. - **F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager:** Reviewers highlight an easy initial setup, especially with vendor assistance, but mention a steep learning curve for advanced features and iRules. ## Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) overall. - Reviewers felt that F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) meets the needs of their business better than Azure Application Gateway. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) over Azure Application Gateway.