When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Azure App Service easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Azure App Service overall.
Reviewers felt that Azure App Service meets the needs of their business better than Google App Engine.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Azure App Service is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Azure App Service over Google App Engine.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure App Service
No pricing available
Google App Engine
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure App Service
No trial information available
Google App Engine
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
75
8.4
157
Ease of Use
8.8
76
8.2
160
Ease of Setup
9.1
42
8.3
76
Ease of Admin
8.8
40
8.4
73
Quality of Support
8.9
70
7.6
148
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Which one of the following is a key feature of Azure app services?
1 Comment
SK
Auto scaling
Deployment swap
Ease of configuration
Allow custom configuration at best
Integration with other service easly like azure devops etc
Read more
Azure App Service has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.