Users report that Axure RP excels in its comprehensive modeling tools, allowing for detailed wireframing and prototyping, while Flinto is praised for its intuitive interface that simplifies the design process.
Reviewers mention that Axure RP's feedback and communication features, such as comment threads and version control, are robust, making collaboration easier compared to Flinto, which has more limited options in this area.
G2 users highlight that Flinto's ease of use is a significant advantage, with many stating that its drag-and-drop functionality makes it accessible for beginners, whereas Axure RP has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features.
Users on G2 report that Axure RP offers a wider range of framework libraries, which is beneficial for users looking to create complex interactions, while Flinto's library is more focused on basic design elements.
Reviewers say that Axure RP's quality of support is generally higher, with more resources available for troubleshooting, while Flinto users have noted that support can be slower and less comprehensive.
Users mention that Axure RP's presentation integrations, such as exporting to HTML and interactive presentations, are superior, allowing for more dynamic sharing of prototypes compared to Flinto's more limited export options.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Axure RP
No pricing available
Flinto
No pricing available
Free Trial
Axure RP
Free Trial is available
Flinto
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
246
8.3
24
Ease of Use
6.8
246
8.4
24
Ease of Setup
8.1
71
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.8
62
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.9
177
7.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.