Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AWS X-Ray and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AWS X-Ray
Star Rating
(16)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS X-RayOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows teams to efficiently manage and organize their test cases. In contrast, AWS X-Ray does not have a comparable feature, which may limit its usability for comprehensive test management.
- Reviewers mention that AWS X-Ray shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.0, making it more accessible for small businesses and teams that may not have extensive technical expertise. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while robust, has a lower Ease of Use score of 7.8, which some users find challenging.
- G2 users highlight the superior Quality of Support for AWS X-Ray, rated at 9.2, indicating that users feel well-supported and valued. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center's support rating of 7.7 suggests that users may experience delays or less effective assistance.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers strong Test Diversity with a score of 9.3, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios. However, AWS X-Ray lacks this level of diversity, which may limit its effectiveness in complex testing environments.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are rated at 8.9, providing detailed insights into testing progress and outcomes. AWS X-Ray, while offering analytics, does not match this level of reporting detail, which could be a drawback for teams needing comprehensive reporting tools.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's strong focus on Automation and Organization, with a score of 9.7, allows for streamlined processes and efficient test management. AWS X-Ray, while effective for monitoring applications, does not emphasize these organizational features, which may hinder workflow efficiency for testing teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS X-Ray
No pricing availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
AWS X-Ray
No trial information availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
11
8.2
118
Ease of Use
9.0
10
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.2
59
Quality of Support
9.2
8
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
10
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS X-Ray and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Test Management and Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
AWS X-Ray has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS X-Ray
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Hospital & Health Care
15.4%
Computer Software
15.4%
Real Estate
7.7%
Photography
7.7%
Online Media
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
AWS X-Ray has no discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
