Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare AWS WAF and Radware Cloud WAF

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Star Rating
(68)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS WAF
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF
Star Rating
(105)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Radware Cloud WAF
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that AWS WAF excels in its Application-Layer Controls with a score of 9.2, which reviewers mention provides robust protection against common web exploits, while Radware Cloud WAF, with a score of 9.0, is noted for its effective but slightly less comprehensive controls.
  • Reviewers mention that AWS WAF has a strong Performance and Reliability rating of 9.1, indicating that it consistently delivers high availability and low latency, whereas Radware Cloud WAF, with a score of 8.9, is reliable but may experience occasional performance dips during peak traffic.
  • Users on G2 highlight that AWS WAF's API / Integrations score of 8.9 is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless integration with other AWS services, while Radware Cloud WAF's score of 8.3 suggests it has fewer integration options, which can limit flexibility for users relying on diverse tech stacks.
  • Reviewers say that both products have similar Logging and Reporting capabilities, each scoring 8.3, but users report that AWS WAF's reporting features are more user-friendly, making it easier to analyze security incidents compared to Radware Cloud WAF.
  • G2 users mention that AWS WAF's Ease of Admin score of 8.3 is significantly lower than Radware Cloud WAF's impressive score of 9.6, indicating that Radware offers a more intuitive administrative interface, which users find easier to navigate and manage.
  • Users report that both products have strong Security Monitoring features, with AWS WAF scoring 8.8 and Radware Cloud WAF scoring 8.9, but reviewers mention that Radware's monitoring tools provide more detailed insights into potential threats, enhancing overall security posture.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing available
Radware Cloud WAF
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information available
Radware Cloud WAF
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
45
8.9
103
Ease of Use
8.2
45
8.9
103
Ease of Setup
8.1
30
8.8
96
Ease of Admin
8.3
30
9.3
56
Quality of Support
8.8
41
8.9
98
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
29
9.0
54
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
45
9.6
104
Features by Category
Web Application Firewall (WAF)Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
8.5
27
8.8
92
Analysis
8.3
22
8.5
92
8.0
20
8.8
91
8.9
22
9.2
91
Controls
9.2
21
9.0
91
8.7
21
8.9
90
8.7
21
8.8
90
Functionality
8.8
20
8.3
90
8.2
19
8.6
89
Not enough data
9.2
58
Generative AI
7.7
10
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF
AWS WAF and Radware Cloud WAF are categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
AWS WAF
AWS WAF has no unique categories
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
31.1%
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
14.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
41.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
44.2%
Reviewers' Industry
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Information Technology and Services
21.3%
Computer Software
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.2%
Computer & Network Security
8.2%
Retail
6.6%
Other
45.9%
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Computer & Network Security
11.5%
Financial Services
7.7%
Banking
6.7%
Manufacturing
5.8%
Other
54.8%
Alternatives
AWS WAF
AWS WAF Alternatives
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
Imperva App Protect
Imperva Cloud Application Security
Add Imperva App Protect
Sucuri
Sucuri
Add Sucuri
ModSecurity
ModSecurity
Add ModSecurity
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF Alternatives
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Add Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Add Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Azure Application Gateway
Azure Application Gateway
Add Azure Application Gateway
Discussions
AWS WAF
AWS WAF Discussions
What is AWS WAF used for?
1 Comment
Prashant G.
PG
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
AWS WAF has no more discussions with answers
Radware Cloud WAF
Radware Cloud WAF Discussions
What is Cloud WAF Service used for?
1 Comment
Nishant K.
NK
A Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) service user is typically created or used for a few specific reasons when working with a cloud‑based WAF solution....Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Radware Cloud WAF has no more discussions with answers