Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AWS WAF and Prophaze 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AWS WAF
Star Rating
(68)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS WAFProphaze
Star Rating
(10)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ProphazeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that AWS WAF excels in Ease of Setup with a score of 8.2, while Prophaze shines with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that Prophaze is significantly easier to implement for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Prophaze offers superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.8 compared to AWS WAF's 8.8, highlighting Prophaze's responsiveness and helpfulness in resolving issues.
- G2 users note that AWS WAF has a strong performance in Application-Layer Controls with a score of 9.2, but Prophaze outperforms it slightly with a score of 9.6, suggesting that Prophaze provides more robust features for application security.
- Users on G2 report that Prophaze leads in Security Monitoring with a score of 9.4, while AWS WAF scores 8.8, indicating that Prophaze may offer more comprehensive monitoring capabilities to detect and respond to threats.
- Reviewers say that AWS WAF has a better score in Performance and Reliability at 9.1, but Prophaze surpasses it with a score of 9.8, suggesting that Prophaze may provide a more stable and reliable service overall.
- Users report that Prophaze's Reporting and Analytics features are rated higher at 9.2 compared to AWS WAF's 8.6, indicating that Prophaze may offer more insightful analytics tools for users to understand their security posture.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing availableProphaze
No pricing availableFree Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information availableProphaze
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
45
9.3
7
Ease of Use
8.2
45
9.5
7
Ease of Setup
8.1
30
10.0
6
Ease of Admin
8.3
30
9.4
6
Quality of Support
8.8
41
9.8
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
29
9.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
45
10.0
7
Features by Category
Analysis
8.3
22
7.7
8
8.0
20
8.5
8
8.9
22
9.4
8
Controls
9.2
21
9.6
8
8.7
21
9.6
8
8.7
21
9.4
8
Functionality
8.8
20
9.0
8
8.2
19
9.0
8
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.7
10
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Resolution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS WAF and Prophaze are categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
AWS WAF has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS WAF
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Prophaze
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
21.3%
Computer Software
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.2%
Computer & Network Security
8.2%
Retail
6.6%
Other
45.9%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
20.0%
Staffing and Recruiting
10.0%
Information Services
10.0%
Individual & Family Services
10.0%
Other
30.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is AWS WAF used for?
1 Comment
PG
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
AWS WAF has no more discussions with answers
Prophaze has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
