When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) overall.
Reviewers felt that Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) meets the needs of their business better than AWS WAF.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) over AWS WAF.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing available
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information available
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
46
9.5
36
Ease of Use
8.2
46
9.3
35
Ease of Setup
8.1
31
9.1
18
Ease of Admin
8.2
31
9.1
17
Quality of Support
8.7
42
9.0
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) Discussions
Is imperva a Web application firewall?
1 Comment
VM
Yes, Imperva is a well-known provider of web application firewall (WAF) solutions. Imperva offers a Web Application Firewall product, known as Imperva WAF,...Read more
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.