When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AWS WAF easier to use and set up. Reviewers also felt that AWS WAF was easier to do business with overall. However, reviewers felt that administration of both products was equally easy.
Reviewers felt that AWS WAF meets the needs of their business better than Google Cloud Armor.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS WAF is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS WAF over Google Cloud Armor.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing available
Google Cloud Armor
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information available
Google Cloud Armor
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
45
8.4
17
Ease of Use
8.2
45
8.1
17
Ease of Setup
8.1
30
8.0
9
Ease of Admin
8.3
30
8.3
8
Quality of Support
8.8
41
8.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
Google Cloud Armor delivers defense at scale against infrastructure and application Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks using Google's global...Read more
Google Cloud Armor has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.