When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Barracuda Web Application Firewall easier to use and set up. However, AWS WAF is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with AWS WAF overall.
Reviewers felt that AWS WAF meets the needs of their business better than Barracuda Web Application Firewall.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS WAF is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Barracuda Web Application Firewall over AWS WAF.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing available
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information available
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
45
8.9
6
Ease of Use
8.2
45
8.6
7
Ease of Setup
8.1
30
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
8.3
30
8.0
5
Quality of Support
8.8
41
8.3
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.