When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Azure Application Gateway easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.
Reviewers felt that AWS WAF meets the needs of their business better than Azure Application Gateway.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS WAF is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS WAF over Azure Application Gateway.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing available
Azure Application Gateway
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information available
Azure Application Gateway
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
46
8.8
102
Ease of Use
8.2
46
8.5
102
Ease of Setup
8.1
31
8.3
69
Ease of Admin
8.2
31
8.6
65
Quality of Support
8.7
42
8.5
100
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
What is the best way I can use App gateway for multiple applications ?
1 Comment
AD
You'd configure your applications to all live under separate domains, subdomains or paths behind your application gateway.
Consider having WordPress CMS,...Read more
Azure Application Gateway has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.