Users report that AWS Key Management Service (KMS) excels in Durability with a score of 9.0, indicating a robust and reliable service for managing encryption keys, while Keyfactor Command, although strong, does not provide a specific durability score.
Reviewers mention that AWS KMS offers superior Envelope Encryption capabilities, scoring 9.3, which is crucial for protecting sensitive data, whereas Keyfactor Command does not highlight this feature as prominently.
G2 users highlight that AWS KMS has a higher score in Scalability at 9.2, making it a better choice for enterprises looking to grow, while Keyfactor Command's scalability features are not as robust, scoring lower in this area.
Users on G2 report that Keyfactor Command shines in Automated Certificate Operations with a score of 7.7, which is essential for managing SSL/TLS certificates efficiently, while AWS KMS does not focus on this functionality.
Reviewers mention that Keyfactor Command has a strong emphasis on Compliance, scoring 9.2, which is critical for organizations needing to adhere to strict regulatory standards, while AWS KMS, although compliant, does not emphasize this aspect as much.
Users say that AWS KMS provides a more user-friendly experience with a higher score in Ease of Setup at 8.3 compared to Keyfactor Command's 7.8, making it easier for new users to get started with the service.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS Key Management Service (KMS)
No pricing available
Keyfactor Command
CLAaaS
Contact Us
Deploy Keyfactor Command Certificate Lifecycle Automation as a Service (CLAaaS) and integrate it with your public, cloud-based, and private CAs.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.