Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare AWS Fargate and Azure Web App for Containers

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Star Rating
(91)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS Fargate
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
Star Rating
(17)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Web App for Containers
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that AWS Fargate excels in its "Virtualization" capabilities, scoring 8.9, which allows for seamless deployment of containerized applications without managing servers. In contrast, Azure Web App for Containers, while strong, scores slightly lower at 8.6, indicating a more traditional approach to virtualization.
  • Reviewers mention that Azure Web App for Containers shines in "Ease of Setup," with a score of 9.4, making it particularly user-friendly for those new to container deployment. AWS Fargate, while still respectable at 8.6, may require a steeper learning curve for some users.
  • G2 users highlight the "Quality of Support" as a significant differentiator, with Azure Web App for Containers receiving a score of 9.4, indicating a more responsive support system. AWS Fargate, at 8.2, has received feedback suggesting that support could be improved, especially during critical deployment phases.
  • Users on G2 report that AWS Fargate's "Container Networking" capabilities, scoring 8.5, provide robust options for connecting services, but Azure Web App for Containers, with a score of 8.5 as well, is noted for its simplicity and ease of integration with other Azure services.
  • Reviewers say that both platforms are strong in "Orchestration," but AWS Fargate's score of 8.6 is often praised for its integration with Amazon ECS, allowing for advanced orchestration features. Azure Web App for Containers, while also scoring 8.6, is noted for its straightforward deployment process, which some users prefer.
  • Users report that AWS Fargate's "Access Control" features, scoring 8.7, provide granular permissions, which is beneficial for larger teams. However, Azure Web App for Containers, with a slightly lower score, is often mentioned for its ease of use in managing access, making it a favorite among smaller teams or individual developers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS Fargate
No pricing available
Azure Web App for Containers
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS Fargate
No trial information available
Azure Web App for Containers
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
67
9.1
9
Ease of Use
8.8
68
9.4
9
Ease of Setup
8.4
32
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
29
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
65
9.3
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
31
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
64
8.7
9
Features by Category
8.6
56
Not enough data
Management
8.7
54
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
8.3
47
Not enough data
Organization
8.4
51
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.6
45
Not enough data
Development
8.4
46
Not enough data
8.6
48
Not enough data
8.6
47
Not enough data
8.9
49
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
AWS Fargate and Azure Web App for Containers are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate has no unique categories
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
34.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
29.5%
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
31.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
31.3%
Reviewers' Industry
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
23.9%
Retail
3.4%
Financial Services
3.4%
Computer Games
3.4%
Other
40.9%
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
Computer Software
37.5%
Computer & Network Security
12.5%
Telecommunications
6.3%
Information Technology and Services
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Other
31.3%
Alternatives
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes Engine
Add Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Add SUSE Rancher
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Add Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Add DigitalOcean
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Add Akamai Cloud Computing
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Discussions
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate Discussions
What exactly is AWS fargate?
1 Comment
☁️Jitendra L.
☁L
AWS Fargate is a serverless, pay-as-you-go compute engine that lets you focus on building applications without managing servers. AWS Fargate is compatible...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
AWS Fargate has no more discussions with answers
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Web App for Containers has no discussions with answers