Compare AWS CodeDeploy and Buildbot 
AWS CodeDeploy vs Buildbot
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AWS CodeDeploy easier to use. However, Buildbot is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Buildbot overall.
- Reviewers felt that Buildbot meets the needs of their business better than AWS CodeDeploy.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS CodeDeploy is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS CodeDeploy over Buildbot.
I used AWS CodeDeploy to automate the deployment of our functions in a blue-green deployment manner to reduce the occurrence of errors in our application in a production system, also with the help of Lambda Versions.
If we compare it too other tools like ArgoCD, Azure DevOps or Jenkins, it is nothing better to serve. CodeDeploy requires many improvements.
The flexibility of the framework. When one thinks of it in a framework vs a product, Buildbot becomes much more. Design and use the framework to fit you needs
I used AWS CodeDeploy to automate the deployment of our functions in a blue-green deployment manner to reduce the occurrence of errors in our application in a production system, also with the help of Lambda Versions.
The flexibility of the framework. When one thinks of it in a framework vs a product, Buildbot becomes much more. Design and use the framework to fit you needs
If we compare it too other tools like ArgoCD, Azure DevOps or Jenkins, it is nothing better to serve. CodeDeploy requires many improvements.
