Users report that Vault excels in its robust security features, particularly its dynamic secrets management, which reviewers mention is a game-changer for enterprises needing to manage sensitive data securely.
Reviewers mention that AWS CodeCommit offers seamless integration with other AWS services, making it a preferred choice for teams already embedded in the AWS ecosystem, which users say enhances their workflow efficiency.
G2 users highlight that Vault's user interface can be complex, with some reviewers saying that the learning curve is steeper compared to AWS CodeCommit, which users report as being more intuitive and easier to navigate.
Users on G2 mention that AWS CodeCommit's pricing model is more favorable for small businesses, as it allows for unlimited repositories at no additional cost, while Vault's pricing can be a concern for smaller teams.
Reviewers say that Vault's support quality is commendable, with many users praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, whereas AWS CodeCommit users report mixed experiences with support, indicating room for improvement.
Users report that Vault's product direction is perceived as strong, with a focus on enhancing security features, while AWS CodeCommit users mention a more stable feature set, which some find less innovative but reliable for their needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeCommit
No pricing available
Vault
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS CodeCommit
No trial information available
Vault
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
52
8.3
9
Ease of Use
8.6
52
8.3
9
Ease of Setup
8.3
18
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.2
17
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
48
8.7
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.