When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AWS CodeCommit easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.
Reviewers felt that AWS CodeCommit meets the needs of their business better than Plastic SCM.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS CodeCommit is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS CodeCommit over Plastic SCM.
You've probably heard of concepts like bug branches, topic branches, and so on, right? Ok, even if you haven't, here's the answer: it's a branch you use to...Read more
But aren't branches supposed to be evil incarnate?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Who told you that? I bet you found that on some Subversion guide, forum, or manual, maybe even on some other SCM website, didn't you? Branches are...Read more
What's Plastic SCM?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Plastic is a version control system: it versions files and directories and keeps track of branching and merging as you've never seen before. And even better?...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.