Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AWS CodeCommit and GitLab 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AWS CodeCommit
Star Rating
(84)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS CodeCommitGitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabAWS CodeCommit vs GitLab
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found GitLab easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with GitLab overall.
- Reviewers felt that GitLab meets the needs of their business better than AWS CodeCommit.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS CodeCommit is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS CodeCommit over GitLab.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeCommit
No pricing availableGitLab
No pricing availableFree Trial
AWS CodeCommit
No trial information availableGitLab
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
52
9.1
650
Ease of Use
8.6
52
8.7
652
Ease of Setup
8.3
18
8.6
213
Ease of Admin
8.2
17
8.6
170
Quality of Support
8.6
48
8.5
514
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
8.8
145
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
52
8.7
617
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Analysis
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Testing
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Analysis
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Testing
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
IT Management
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Management
Not enough data
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Security
Not enough data
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Value Management
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS CodeCommit and GitLab share no categories
Unique Categories
AWS CodeCommit is categorized as Version Control Software
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS CodeCommit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.5%
Information Technology and Services
14.5%
Financial Services
6.6%
Marketing and Advertising
5.3%
Hospital & Health Care
3.9%
Other
34.2%
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is AWS CodeCommit used for?
1 Comment
KC
AWS CodeCommit is a Git-like repository for storing and versioning your source code.Read more
AWS CodeCommit has no more discussions with answers
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
