# AWS CodeCommit vs Git Comparison --- ## AI Generated Summary - **G2 reviewers report** that Git excels in its ability to track changes and manage code versions effectively. Users appreciate features like branching and merge requests, which facilitate collaboration and code review processes, making it a go-to tool for many developers. - **Users say** AWS CodeCommit shines in its seamless integration with other AWS services, enhancing team collaboration and simplifying code management. Reviewers highlight its capabilities in building CI/CD pipelines and managing Docker images, which are crucial for modern development workflows. - **According to verified reviews** , Git has a higher overall satisfaction score, indicating that users feel more positively about their experience. Many users describe it as a "safety net" for their projects, emphasizing its reliability and the commitment it fosters in their work. - **Reviewers mention** that while AWS CodeCommit is secure and scalable, it has fewer recent reviews compared to Git, which may suggest a smaller user base or less frequent updates. This could impact the community support and resources available for troubleshooting. - **G2 reviewers highlight** that Git's implementation process is quick and intuitive, making it easier for new users to get started. In contrast, some AWS CodeCommit users have noted that while it integrates well with AWS tools, the initial setup can be more complex. - **Users report** that both platforms offer solid support, but Git edges out slightly with a higher quality of support rating. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of Git's support team, which can be a significant factor for teams needing assistance during critical development phases. | | AWS CodeCommit | Git | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.2 out of 5 | 4.7 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 87 | 535 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (50.6% of reviews) | Small-Business (35.5% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Top Pros & Cons ### AWS CodeCommit Pros: - Cloud Services (1 reviews) - Collaboration (1 reviews) Cons: - Complexity Issues (1 reviews) - Cost Management (1 reviews) ### Git **Not enough data** --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | AWS CodeCommit | Git | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 8.9 (55 reviews) | 9.4 (464 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.6 (55 reviews) | 8.2 (466 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | 8.5 (21 reviews) | 9.0 (133 reviews) | | **Ease of Admin** | 8.3 (18 reviews) | 8.2 (72 reviews) | | **Quality of Support** | 8.6 (51 reviews) | 8.7 (378 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.5 (17 reviews) | 8.7 (57 reviews) | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 9.6 (55 reviews) | 9.1 (450 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### AWS CodeCommit #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### Git #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available --- ## Categories **Shared Categories (1):** [Version Control Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | AWS CodeCommit | Git | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 50.6% | 35.5% | | **Mid-Market** | 30.4% | 29.0% | | **Enterprise** | 19.0% | 35.5% | ### By Industry #### AWS CodeCommit - **Computer Software:** 35.4% - **Information Technology and Services:** 13.9% - **Financial Services:** 6.3% - **Marketing and Advertising:** 5.1% - **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.8% - **Design:** 2.5% - **Education Management:** 2.5% - **Health, Wellness and Fitness:** 2.5% - **Higher Education:** 2.5% - **Telecommunications:** 2.5% - **Other:** 22.8% #### Git - **Computer Software:** 32.8% - **Information Technology and Services:** 20.7% - **Internet:** 8.6% - **Marketing and Advertising:** 4.0% - **Computer & Network Security:** 2.9% - **Education Management:** 2.9% - **Higher Education:** 1.9% - **Financial Services:** 1.9% - **Computer Networking:** 1.7% - **Automotive:** 1.5% - **Other:** 20.9% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to AWS CodeCommit - [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews) - [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews) - [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (95 reviews) - [Mercurial](https://www.g2.com/products/mercurial/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (31 reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews) - [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews) - [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (13 reviews) - [Redgate Flyway](https://www.g2.com/products/redgate-flyway/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (95 reviews) - [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) — 2.9/5 stars (40 reviews) - [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews) ### Alternatives to Git - [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews) - [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (95 reviews) - [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews) - [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) — 2.9/5 stars (40 reviews) - [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews) - [Mercurial](https://www.g2.com/products/mercurial/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (31 reviews) - [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews) - [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (13 reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews) - [Kiln](https://www.g2.com/products/kiln/reviews) — 5.0/5 stars (1 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### AWS CodeCommit - Title: [What is AWS CodeCommit used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-aws-codecommit-used-for) — 1 comment > **Top comment:** "AWS CodeCommit is a Git-like repository for storing and versioning your source code." ### Git - Title: [What is Git used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-git-used-for) — 4 comments, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "version control" - Title: [sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf](https://www.g2.com/discussions/sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf) — 2 comments, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "bad review" - Title: [what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience](https://www.g2.com/discussions/29849-what-is-the-most-channeling-use-of-git-in-your-experience) — 2 comments > **Top comment:** "The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. " --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-git)