Reviews say that CVS has a lower ease of use rating (7.1) compared to AWS CodeCommit (8.6), indicating that users find CodeCommit more intuitive and user-friendly for version control tasks.
Users report that AWS CodeCommit excels in setup ease with a score of 8.3, while CVS lacks a comparable score, suggesting that CodeCommit is quicker to implement and integrate into existing workflows.
Reviewers mention that the quality of support for AWS CodeCommit is rated higher (8.6) than that of CVS (7.1), highlighting that users feel more supported and satisfied with the assistance they receive from CodeCommit's support team.
G2 users indicate that AWS CodeCommit has a significantly better product direction score (9.6) compared to CVS (3.5), suggesting that users perceive CodeCommit as having a more promising and innovative future roadmap.
Users on G2 highlight that CVS is primarily favored by enterprise users, while AWS CodeCommit is more popular among small businesses, reflecting a difference in target market and user needs.
Reviewers mention that AWS CodeCommit has a higher overall star rating (4.2) compared to CVS (3.5), which may influence potential buyers looking for a more reliable and well-regarded version control solution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeCommit
No pricing available
CVS
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS CodeCommit
No trial information available
CVS
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
52
7.3
11
Ease of Use
8.6
52
7.1
11
Ease of Setup
8.3
18
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.2
17
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
48
7.1
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.