When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AWS CodeCommit easier to use. However, Amazon S3 Glacier is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Amazon S3 Glacier overall.
AWS CodeCommit and Amazon S3 Glacier both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS CodeCommit is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS CodeCommit over Amazon S3 Glacier.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeCommit
No pricing available
Amazon S3 Glacier
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS CodeCommit
No trial information available
Amazon S3 Glacier
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
52
8.9
100
Ease of Use
8.6
52
8.3
99
Ease of Setup
8.3
18
8.4
60
Ease of Admin
8.2
17
8.4
57
Quality of Support
8.6
48
8.5
88
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.