Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare AWS CodeBuild and GitHub

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Star Rating
(37)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS CodeBuild
GitHub
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing the overall development workflow. In contrast, AWS CodeBuild, while also strong with a score of 9.2, is noted for its Extensibility, allowing users to customize their build processes more extensively.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use is a significant advantage, with a score of 8.7, making it accessible for teams of all sizes. AWS CodeBuild, with a slightly lower score of 8.5, is perceived as more complex, particularly for new users who may find the setup process less intuitive.
  • G2 users highlight GitHub's Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, indicating a responsive and helpful support team. Conversely, AWS CodeBuild received a higher score of 8.9, with users praising its comprehensive documentation and support resources, which are particularly beneficial for troubleshooting.
  • Users on G2 report that GitHub's Task Management features, scoring 8.9, are well-integrated with its version control system, making it easier to manage projects. AWS CodeBuild, while offering solid Automation features with a score of 8.9, is noted for its robust pipeline control, which some users find more suited for larger, more complex projects.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment-Ready Staging feature, scoring 9.0, simplifies the process of preparing code for production, which is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their deployment processes. AWS CodeBuild, however, shines in Continuous Deployment with a score of 9.0, allowing for more automated and efficient deployment cycles.
  • Users say that GitHub's Configuration Management features, scoring 8.8, provide a user-friendly interface for managing settings and permissions. In contrast, AWS CodeBuild's Processes and Workflow management, with a score of 9.0, is praised for its flexibility and ability to adapt to various development methodologies, making it a strong choice for teams with diverse workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeBuild
No pricing available
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
AWS CodeBuild
No trial information available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
28
9.3
1,962
Ease of Use
8.5
28
8.7
1,978
Ease of Setup
8.5
11
9.0
589
Ease of Admin
8.3
11
8.7
450
Quality of Support
8.8
26
8.8
1,569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
11
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
26
8.9
1,914
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.7
157
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
8.6
53
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.8
108
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
8.8
258
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
8.8
210
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.8
84
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
8.8
149
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.5
236
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.6
201
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
38.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.8%
GitHub
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.0%
Reviewers' Industry
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Computer Software
41.7%
Financial Services
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Retail
2.8%
Program Development
2.8%
Other
25.0%
GitHub
GitHub
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild Alternatives
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
CircleCI
CircleCI
Add CircleCI
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Add Google Cloud Build
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Add Sonatype Nexus Repository
GitHub
GitHub Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Discussions
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
AWS CodeBuild has no discussions with answers
GitHub
GitHub Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code - use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases - lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
Mohanendra S.
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
Jagadeesh V.
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more