Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AutoSys Workload Automation and Control-M 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ActiveBatch
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (62.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $29,000.00 500 Executions Per Month
AutoSys Workload Automation
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AutoSys Workload AutomationControl-M
Star Rating
(106)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (62.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $29,000.00 500 Executions Per Month
Learn more about Control-MSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Control-M excels in Real-Time Data Collection with a score of 9.7, which reviewers mention significantly enhances their ability to monitor workloads effectively. In contrast, AutoSys Workload Automation, while strong, does not match this level of performance in real-time capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that AutoSys Workload Automation shines in Workflow Management, scoring 9.5, which users say provides a more intuitive interface for managing complex workflows compared to Control-M's score of 9.1.
- G2 users highlight that Control-M's Job Scheduling capabilities are robust, with a score of 9.4, but users on G2 note that AutoSys also matches this score, indicating both products are competitive in this area.
- Users say that AutoSys Workload Automation offers superior API / Integrations support with a score of 8.8, which reviewers mention allows for easier integration with other tools compared to Control-M's score of 8.2.
- Reviewers mention that Control-M's Proactive Workflow feature, scoring 9.1, is particularly beneficial for anticipating issues, while AutoSys's score of 8.3 indicates it may not be as effective in this proactive approach.
- Users report that both products have strong Quality of Support, with Control-M scoring 8.6 and AutoSys slightly higher at 8.8, suggesting that users may find AutoSys's support to be more responsive and helpful based on user feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AutoSys Workload Automation
No pricing availableControl-M
Starter Pack (SaaS)
Starting at $29,000.00
500 Executions Per Month
Full-featured Control-M SaaS orchestration — right-sized for growing teams and hybrid cloud apps.
- Visual Workflow Designer
- Cloud native & hybrid app integration
- API jobs, event triggers, file transfer
Free Trial
AutoSys Workload Automation
No trial information availableControl-M
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
34
9.0
70
Ease of Use
9.0
35
8.7
71
Ease of Setup
9.1
18
8.1
38
Ease of Admin
8.9
18
8.6
30
Quality of Support
8.8
33
8.5
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
18
9.1
31
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
30
8.3
67
Features by Category
Automation
9.2
20
9.0
43
9.1
21
8.6
41
8.7
20
8.3
23
Administration
8.8
18
8.2
35
9.4
20
8.8
38
8.8
16
8.4
37
8.3
18
8.3
23
8.5
19
8.6
21
8.8
18
8.4
22
Functionality
9.4
21
9.3
43
8.8
16
8.1
35
8.8
19
8.3
23
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.2
6
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AutoSys Workload Automation and Control-M are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
AutoSys Workload Automation has no unique categories
Control-M is categorized as Runbook Automation, Big Data Processing and Distribution, iPaaS, Build Automation, Continuous Integration, Continuous Delivery, and Big Data Integration Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AutoSys Workload Automation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Control-M
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
38.3%
Banking
19.1%
Computer Software
6.4%
Architecture & Planning
6.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
25.5%
Information Technology and Services
27.4%
Banking
8.4%
Retail
7.4%
Insurance
7.4%
Financial Services
7.4%
Other
42.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
AutoSys Workload Automation has no discussions with answers
What does control-M software do?
1 Comment
SS
I used it in banking requirrd to automate job and scheduler.Read more
Is Control-M an ETL tool?
1 Comment
LV
Yes. Control-M is used for scheduling and monitoring the jobs in ETL.Read more
What is workflow in control-M?
1 Comment
LV
Control-M Workflow Insights provides valuable dashboards that give users in-depth observability to continuously monitor and improve performance of the...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
