# AutoSPF vs EasyDMARC Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that EasyDMARC excels in user satisfaction, with many praising its ability to easily identify and resolve email security issues related to SPF, DMARC, and DKIM. Users appreciate the straightforward instructions that make compliance easy to understand and implement.
- **Users say** AutoSPF effectively addresses specific challenges, such as managing SPF record lookups. Reviewers highlight its capability to keep a log of changes, which helps prevent mistakes, making it a reliable choice for those needing to navigate complex SPF configurations.
- **According to verified reviews** , EasyDMARC has a significantly higher G2 Score, indicating overall better user satisfaction compared to AutoSPF. This is reflected in the volume of recent reviews, with EasyDMARC receiving 20 reviews in the last 90 days, showcasing its active user base and ongoing support.
- **Reviewers mention** that while AutoSPF is easy to set up and provides a cost-effective solution for SPF flattening, it has fewer recent reviews, which may indicate less current user engagement or support compared to EasyDMARC&#39;s robust feedback.
- **Users highlight** the quality of support from EasyDMARC, noting that the service consistently monitors the effectiveness of configurations. This proactive approach to support is a key differentiator, as users feel more secure knowing their email security is being actively managed.
- **Reviewers indicate** that AutoSPF provides excellent support when issues arise, with quick responses and helpful resources, such as video demonstrations. However, the overall user experience may not be as comprehensive as that of EasyDMARC, which offers a more holistic approach to email security management.



| | AutoSPF | EasyDMARC | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 5.0 out of 5 | 4.8 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 21 | 213 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Mid-Market (36.8% of reviews) | Small-Business (56.9% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | $37.00 Per Month | $0.00 | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### AutoSPF

**Not enough data**

### EasyDMARC

Pros:
- Ease of Use (19 reviews)
- Customer Support (17 reviews)

Cons:
- Limited Functionality (6 reviews)
- Expensive (5 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | AutoSPF | EasyDMARC | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 10.0 (14 reviews) | 9.7 (124 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 9.7 (13 reviews) | 9.4 (187 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 9.7 (13 reviews) | 9.4 (110 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 9.6 (13 reviews) | 9.5 (97 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 10.0 (15 reviews) | 9.6 (124 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 10.0 (14 reviews) | 9.5 (95 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 10.0 (11 reviews) | 9.5 (123 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### AutoSPF

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: SMB

Price: $37.00 Per Month

Description: Designed for businesses that need to solve the SPF flattening for a single domain without any of the extras that Managed Service Providers or Enterprise users need. Fully functional, and not missing any core features it will perform flawlessly to fix your SPF record instantly. 

Key Features:
- Unlimited SPF Flattening
- 1 Domain
- 1 User

[Browse all 3 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/autospf/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

### EasyDMARC

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free (for personal use only)

Price: $0.00

Key Features:
- Up to 1,000 emails per month
- 1 Domain
- 14 Days Data History

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/easydmarc/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### DMARC

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **AutoSPF** | N/A | N/A |
| **EasyDMARC** | 9.1/10 | 115 |

#### Diagnostics

| Feature | AutoSPF | EasyDMARC | 
|---|---|---|
| **Account Overview** | Not enough data | 9.4 (108 reviews) | 
| **DMARC Alignment** | Not enough data | 9.5 (106 reviews) | 
| **Analytics** | Not enough data | 9.4 (108 reviews) | 

#### Compliance

| Feature | AutoSPF | EasyDMARC | 
|---|---|---|
| **Policy Configuration** | Not enough data | 9.6 (104 reviews) | 
| **Alerts** | Not enough data | 9.1 (101 reviews) | 
| **Inbound Emails** | Not enough data | 9.1 (99 reviews) | 
| **Outbound Emails** | Not enough data | 9.4 (104 reviews) | 

#### Protection

| Feature | AutoSPF | EasyDMARC | 
|---|---|---|
| **Threat Identifications** | Not enough data | 9.0 (102 reviews) | 
| **Threat Interception** | Not enough data | 8.7 (94 reviews) | 
| **Threat Removal** | Not enough data | 8.3 (88 reviews) | 
| **Integrations** | Not enough data | 8.3 (88 reviews) | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [DMARC Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/dmarc)




---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | AutoSPF | EasyDMARC | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 26.3% | 56.9% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 36.8% | 38.6% | 
| **Enterprise** | 36.8% | 4.6% | 

### By Industry

#### AutoSPF

- **Non-Profit Organization Management:** 10.5%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 10.5%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 10.5%
- **Higher Education:** 10.5%
- **Education Management:** 10.5%
- **Primary/Secondary Education:** 5.3%
- **Insurance:** 5.3%
- **Information Services:** 5.3%
- **Fine Art:** 5.3%
- **Financial Services:** 5.3%
- **Other:** 21.1%

#### EasyDMARC

- **Information Technology and Services:** 21.2%
- **Computer &amp; Network Security:** 10.6%
- **Computer Software:** 9.1%
- **Primary/Secondary Education:** 5.1%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 4.5%
- **Financial Services:** 4.5%
- **Non-Profit Organization Management:** 3.5%
- **Consumer Goods:** 3.0%
- **Health, Wellness and Fitness:** 2.5%
- **Entertainment:** 2.5%
- **Other:** 33.3%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to AutoSPF

- [Valimail](https://www.g2.com/products/valimail/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (459 reviews)
- [ZeroBounce](https://www.g2.com/products/zerobounce/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (1367 reviews)
- [PowerDMARC](https://www.g2.com/products/powerdmarc/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (244 reviews)
- [Everest](https://www.g2.com/products/validity-inc-everest/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (189 reviews)
- [Red Sift OnDMARC](https://www.g2.com/products/red-sift-red-sift-ondmarc/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (107 reviews)
- [CTM360](https://www.g2.com/products/ctm360-ctm360/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (127 reviews)
- [IRONSCALES](https://www.g2.com/products/ironscales/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (65 reviews)
- [Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection](https://www.g2.com/products/hornetsecurity-365-total-protection/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (65 reviews)
- [MXToolbox](https://www.g2.com/products/mxtoolbox/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (29 reviews)
- [Suped](https://www.g2.com/products/suped/reviews) — 5.0/5 stars (55 reviews)

### Alternatives to EasyDMARC

- [Valimail](https://www.g2.com/products/valimail/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (459 reviews)
- [DMARC Report](https://www.g2.com/products/dmarc-report/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (471 reviews)
- [PowerDMARC](https://www.g2.com/products/powerdmarc/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (244 reviews)
- [Red Sift OnDMARC](https://www.g2.com/products/red-sift-red-sift-ondmarc/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (107 reviews)
- [MXToolbox](https://www.g2.com/products/mxtoolbox/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (29 reviews)
- [Everest](https://www.g2.com/products/validity-inc-everest/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (189 reviews)
- [dmarcian](https://www.g2.com/products/dmarcian/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (5 reviews)
- [GoDMARC](https://www.g2.com/products/godmarc/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Sendmarc](https://www.g2.com/products/sendmarc/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (43 reviews)
- [ZeroBounce](https://www.g2.com/products/zerobounce/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (1367 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### AutoSPF

No discussions available for this product.

### EasyDMARC

- Title: [What is EasyDMARC used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-easydmarc-used-for) — 2 comments
  > **Top comment:** "It’s used to monitor SPF and DMarc traffic. When failure report is generated, EasyDMARC converts it to a graph with useable IP information to manage any..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/autospf-vs-easydmarc)

