Users report that both AutoRFP.ai and Iris excel in ease of use, with AutoRFP.ai scoring 9.3 and Iris scoring 9.9. Reviewers mention that Iris has a more intuitive interface, making it easier for new users to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
Reviewers mention that AutoRFP.ai shines in template creation and flexibility, scoring 9.9 compared to Iris's 8.9. Users appreciate the extensive customization options available in AutoRFP.ai, allowing for tailored templates that meet specific business needs.
G2 users highlight the collaborative creation features of both products, with both scoring 9.7. However, users on G2 note that Iris offers superior assembly and approval workflows, scoring 10.0, which streamlines the review process significantly.
Users report that while both products have strong reporting capabilities, Iris outperforms AutoRFP.ai in proposal effectiveness reporting, scoring 9.4 compared to AutoRFP.ai's 7.9. Reviewers mention that Iris provides more actionable insights that help improve proposal strategies.
Reviewers mention that AutoRFP.ai has a robust questions library, scoring 9.5, but Iris takes the lead with a perfect score of 10.0. Users appreciate the comprehensive nature of Iris's library, which aids in creating more effective RFPs.
Users report that both products have strong support quality, with both scoring 9.9. However, reviewers mention that AutoRFP.ai has been particularly praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness in resolving issues quickly, making it a reliable partner in business.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.