Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AutoReimbursement.com and Cardata 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
TripLog
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Mercury
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (61.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (60.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AutoReimbursement.com
Star Rating
(31)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (61.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AutoReimbursement.comCardata
Star Rating
(438)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (60.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CardataSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cardata excels in "Employee Reimbursement" with a score of 9.3, indicating a smooth process for reimbursing employees, while AutoReimbursement.com shines in "Reimbursement" with a higher score of 9.5, suggesting a more efficient overall reimbursement experience.
- Reviewers mention that AutoReimbursement.com offers superior "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.7 compared to Cardata's 9.0, highlighting that users find it easier to get started with AutoReimbursement.com.
- G2 users note that Cardata has a lower score of 8.3 in "Smart Categorization," which may lead to less efficient expense tracking compared to AutoReimbursement.com, which has not been rated in this specific area but generally scores higher in expense management features.
- Users on G2 highlight that AutoReimbursement.com provides better "Tracking" capabilities, particularly in "Mileage" and "Logs," with scores of 9.4 and 9.2 respectively, while Cardata's scores of 8.5 in both areas suggest it may not be as robust in tracking mileage and logs.
- Reviewers say that Cardata's "Quality of Support" is rated at 9.3, which is commendable, but AutoReimbursement.com surpasses this with a score of 9.8, indicating that users may receive more effective assistance when needed.
- Users report that AutoReimbursement.com has a significant advantage in "Product Direction" with a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that users feel confident in the future development of the product, while Cardata's score of 7.6 indicates some concerns about its ongoing evolution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AutoReimbursement.com
No pricing availableCardata
No pricing availableFree Trial
AutoReimbursement.com
No trial information availableCardata
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
30
8.8
336
Ease of Use
9.6
30
8.8
346
Ease of Setup
9.7
29
8.8
166
Ease of Admin
9.9
26
9.2
21
Quality of Support
9.9
29
9.2
313
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
26
10.0
21
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
30
7.7
314
Features by Category
Expense Reports
8.8
11
8.6
53
7.9
8
8.4
48
8.1
8
7.9
44
8.1
7
8.0
33
9.1
9
9.1
69
7.8
6
7.8
34
7.8
6
7.5
32
Agentic AI - Expense Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Travel Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
36
Not enough data
7.7
36
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Client Invoicing
Not enough data
8.2
35
Not enough data
8.7
48
Not enough data
8.0
33
Mobile
9.3
5
7.6
33
9.8
8
8.6
64
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Platform
Not enough data
7.1
32
Not enough data
7.9
37
Administration
7.3
5
8.3
36
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
39
9.0
5
8.0
44
9.8
7
8.8
56
9.2
6
8.6
50
8.9
6
8.7
49
Platform
8.9
6
8.3
51
Not enough data
7.2
32
Not enough data
7.3
30
9.7
5
8.2
49
8.3
5
8.7
47
Not enough data
7.6
41
Setup
9.2
19
8.1
259
9.6
18
8.1
229
9.3
18
8.5
240
8.9
19
8.1
232
Tracking
9.4
20
8.4
265
9.3
20
8.4
249
8.9
19
8.2
233
Reimbursement
9.4
20
8.7
259
7.9
18
7.8
208
9.2
17
8.1
201
Platform - Mileage Tracking
9.5
19
7.9
150
9.6
19
8.6
148
Agentic AI - Mileage Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AutoReimbursement.com and Cardata are categorized as Expense Management and Mileage Tracking
Unique Categories
AutoReimbursement.com has no unique categories
Cardata has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AutoReimbursement.com
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Cardata
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Food & Beverages
16.1%
Manufacturing
12.9%
Wholesale
9.7%
Medical Devices
9.7%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
6.5%
Other
45.2%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
7.8%
Construction
6.8%
Food & Beverages
6.2%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Environmental Services
5.3%
Other
68.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
AutoReimbursement.com has no discussions with answers
Why is your team so phenomenal?
2 Comments
PA
Very helpful and prompt in answering any concers with regards to car data programRead more
Why is the vehicle and mileage reimbursement so much lower with Cardata compared to other providers
1 Comment
MD
Thank you so much for taking the time to provide this feedback. At Cardata we are investing heavily into creating a world class suite of tools to make the...Read more
Cardata has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
