Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Automic Automation and JAMS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ActiveBatch
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$9,996.00 Per Year
Automic Automation
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Automic AutomationJAMS
Star Rating
(218)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that JAMS excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Automic Automation. Users appreciate how JAMS has transformed their workflow, providing a clear view of tasks and simplifying job management across servers.
- Users say that JAMS offers a more intuitive setup experience, with many highlighting the straightforward process of setting up triggers based on time or specific events. In contrast, Automic Automation's setup process has been noted as more challenging, which can hinder quick implementation.
- Reviewers mention that JAMS provides exceptional support quality, with a score that reflects users' positive experiences. Many users have praised the structured design of the user interface and the ease of integrating with various Windows applications, making it a reliable partner in business.
- According to verified reviews, Automic Automation shines in its scripting capabilities and extensive API integrations, making it a strong choice for users needing end-to-end orchestration. However, some users feel that its overall user experience is less polished compared to JAMS.
- Users highlight that JAMS is particularly effective for mid-market companies, as evidenced by its strong presence in that segment. In contrast, Automic Automation is more focused on enterprise-level solutions, which may not cater as well to smaller organizations looking for flexibility.
- Reviewers note that while both products offer solid job scheduling features, JAMS stands out with a higher satisfaction rating. Users appreciate the ease of managing jobs and the visibility it provides during busy periods, which can be crucial for maintaining operational efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Automic Automation
No pricing availableJAMS
Core
$9,996.00
Per Year
Perfect for small teams getting started with automation.
Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, & 20+ others.
- Full IT and data orchestration
- Cross-platform job scheduling
- Advanced workflow automation
Free Trial
Automic Automation
No trial information availableJAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
9.0
170
Ease of Use
8.3
9
8.6
172
Ease of Setup
7.1
7
8.5
137
Ease of Admin
7.9
7
8.6
109
Quality of Support
8.5
9
9.3
165
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
7
9.2
108
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
9
9.2
165
Features by Category
Automation
8.7
9
8.9
149
8.5
9
8.9
134
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
8.1
9
8.5
144
9.3
9
8.5
131
8.1
9
8.4
117
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
79
Not enough data
8.9
74
Functionality
9.1
9
9.3
140
8.5
8
8.4
111
Not enough data
8.1
73
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
6.8
16
Not enough data
6.7
15
Not enough data
6.8
15
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
6.3
14
Not enough data
6.9
14
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Automic Automation and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
Automic Automation has no unique categories
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Automic Automation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Computer Software
25.0%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Retail
8.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Other
16.7%
Financial Services
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.9%
Insurance
7.0%
Banking
4.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
59.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Automic Automation has no discussions with answers
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 Comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 Comments
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 Comments
RG
A JAMS job is a definition for a task to be performed. It can be triggered by the appearance of a file at a certain location, an email receipt, a date/time...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
