Compare AutogenAI and Responsive, formerly RFPIO 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AutogenAI
Star Rating
(134)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AutogenAIResponsive, formerly RFPIO
Star Rating
(1,273)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Responsive, formerly RFPIOSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Responsive, formerly RFPIO, excels in user experience, with many praising its intuitive interface and smooth button placement. Users appreciate features like the Heads-Up Display (HUD) that enhance usability, making it easier to compile relevant information quickly.
- Users say that AutogenAI offers a straightforward experience, particularly highlighting its intuitive design. Reviewers mention that it allows for flexibility in working with different teams, which can be beneficial for collaborative projects, although some feel it lacks the depth of features found in Responsive.
- According to verified reviews, Responsive stands out for its quick implementation process, with users noting that the setup is simple and well-communicated. This has led to a significant reduction in response times for RFPs, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to streamline their workflow.
- Reviewers mention that while AutogenAI provides multiple output options, it sometimes lacks the advanced features that Responsive offers, such as robust reporting and document creation capabilities. Users have expressed a desire for more comprehensive tools to enhance their proposal effectiveness.
- G2 reviewers highlight the quality of support provided by Responsive, with many users appreciating the helpfulness of the support team and the frequent communication regarding updates and best practices. This level of support contributes to a more positive overall experience compared to AutogenAI, where users have noted that support could be improved.
- Users report that while both products cater to mid-market segments, Responsive has a stronger market presence and a higher overall satisfaction score. This is reflected in the volume of recent reviews, where Responsive has significantly more feedback, indicating a more engaged user base and a proven track record in the industry.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AutogenAI
No pricing availableResponsive, formerly RFPIO
No pricing availableFree Trial
AutogenAI
No trial information availableResponsive, formerly RFPIO
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
116
8.8
1,048
Ease of Use
7.9
119
8.7
1,064
Ease of Setup
8.5
102
8.6
630
Ease of Admin
8.4
37
8.7
543
Quality of Support
9.5
111
9.1
920
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
38
9.3
527
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
116
9.0
1,018
Features by Category
Document Creation
7.4
58
8.4
466
|
Verified
6.7
58
8.0
454
|
Verified
4.3
57
7.8
419
|
Verified
6.5
61
8.1
399
|
Verified
5.6
55
8.0
362
|
Verified
5.2
54
8.1
396
|
Verified
Workflow
7.7
56
8.2
419
|
Verified
7.9
57
8.8
458
|
Verified
6.9
56
8.5
435
|
Verified
Analytics
5.8
55
8.2
366
|
Verified
5.9
55
8.3
399
|
Verified
5.6
55
8.4
451
|
Verified
Administration and Platform
7.3
53
8.8
490
|
Verified
5.9
56
8.4
479
|
Verified
5.1
53
7.7
317
|
Verified
4.4
53
7.3
235
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
5.2
52
7.6
250
|
Verified
Generative AI
9.0
56
7.5
139
Document Management
7.5
77
Not enough data
7.4
66
Not enough data
6.2
68
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Qualifications
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.5
64
Not enough data
5.7
63
Not enough data
Construction Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.0
61
Not enough data
6.4
63
Not enough data
Grammar
8.8
68
Not enough data
8.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
Formatting
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.4
68
Not enough data
7.4
67
Not enough data
Content
8.2
68
Not enough data
8.9
70
Not enough data
6.7
64
Not enough data
Product Type
8.5
65
Not enough data
5.3
62
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.8
68
Not enough data
RFP Generation
6.7
38
7.5
508
7.0
36
8.3
499
6.9
36
8.0
490
8.4
39
8.9
617
RFP Distribution
Feature Not Available
8.1
506
Feature Not Available
7.6
484
Feature Not Available
7.8
487
Submissions
7.8
37
8.8
590
8.9
41
8.8
618
8.2
41
8.6
567
5.9
37
7.8
397
RFP Response
6.8
38
8.5
513
8.0
40
8.8
574
7.4
38
8.7
550
7.3
39
7.8
408
6.8
38
8.1
408
8.2
39
7.9
402
Agentic AI - RFP
Not enough data
7.0
67
Not enough data
6.8
64
Not enough data
6.7
67
Data Sources
Not enough data
8.1
113
Not enough data
7.8
117
Not enough data
8.4
119
Generation
Not enough data
8.0
117
Not enough data
8.2
115
Not enough data
8.0
111
Delivery
Not enough data
8.4
111
Not enough data
8.0
104
Not enough data
7.8
92
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.6
74
Not enough data
7.6
72
Not enough data
6.5
51
Not enough data
6.2
50
Agentic AI - Document Generation
Not enough data
5.3
6
Functionality
Not enough data
7.4
112
Not enough data
7.5
109
Not enough data
7.7
124
Not enough data
8.5
143
Risk assessment
Not enough data
7.1
106
Not enough data
6.6
103
Not enough data
7.7
115
Not enough data
6.7
20
Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
Not enough data
7.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
24
Supplier Marketplace
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Contract Management
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Data Collection
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Project Management
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Agentic AI - Strategic Sourcing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Unique Categories
AutogenAI is categorized as Bid Management and AI Writing Assistant
Responsive, formerly RFPIO is categorized as Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment, Strategic Sourcing, Document Generation, and Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AutogenAI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Facilities Services
10.9%
Construction
10.9%
Consulting
9.2%
Information Technology and Services
7.6%
Civil Engineering
5.0%
Other
56.3%
Computer Software
23.8%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Financial Services
7.1%
Insurance
5.0%
Hospital & Health Care
4.6%
Other
39.3%
Discussions
AutogenAI has no discussions with answers
What is RFPIO used for?
1 Comment
JP
RFPIO is used for RFP/RFx/RFI response management tool. This tool helps to upload the request from prospect/customer as a doc and configurable to assign...Read more
What is RFP360, an RFPIO company used for?
1 Comment
JP
RFP360 is a software platform designed to streamline the Request for Proposal (RFP) process. It is developed by RFPIO, which is a company specializing in...Read more
Are any plans of including AI/machine learning capabilities?
1 Comment
SO
Great question and thanks for asking. RFPIO's product as a whole is based upon machine learning, which helps suggest content for answers based on questions...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
or continue with
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
