Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AutoCAD and Shapr3D 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Higharc
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (84.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$2940/2 years
Free
AutoCAD
Star Rating
(1,846)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$2940/2 years
Browse all 4 pricing plansShapr3D
Star Rating
(168)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that AutoCAD excels in traditional 2D drawing capabilities, with a drawing score of 9.2, while Shapr3D shines in 3D modeling with a perfect score of 9.5, making it more suitable for users focused on three-dimensional design.
- Reviewers mention that Shapr3D offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.5 compared to AutoCAD's 8.3, highlighting its intuitive interface and user-friendly tools that cater to beginners and small businesses.
- G2 users note that AutoCAD's rendering capabilities score 7.6, which some find lacking compared to Shapr3D's 8.5, where users appreciate the high-quality visual outputs that enhance presentations and client communications.
- Users on G2 report that Shapr3D's collaboration features, particularly in annotating and documentation, score 8.0 and 8.3 respectively, while AutoCAD's scores are slightly lower, indicating that Shapr3D may be more effective for teams needing seamless collaboration.
- Reviewers say that AutoCAD's data management features, such as data capture and manipulation, score 8.5, but Shapr3D's focus on mobile accessibility and ease of data visualization with a score of 9.4 makes it a preferred choice for users on the go.
- Users report that while AutoCAD has a higher entry-level price of $2940 for two years, Shapr3D's free entry-level option is a significant advantage for small businesses and startups looking to minimize costs while still accessing powerful design tools.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AutoCAD
2 Year Subscription
$2940
/2 years
Ideal for businesses that want consistent long-term pricing.
- Access to the latest software releases
- 1-on-1 online support
- Includes AutoCAD Mobile App
Shapr3D
Free
Free
Try Shapr3D for free for an unlimited period
- 2 designs
- Access Shapr3D on iPad, Mac, and Windows
- Import - X_T, X_B, IGES, STEP, STL, SLDPRT, SLDASM, SHAPR, DXF, DWG, Image
Free Trial
AutoCAD
Free Trial is available
Shapr3D
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
1,522
9.0
115
Ease of Use
8.3
1,527
9.4
116
Ease of Setup
8.2
288
9.0
35
Ease of Admin
8.0
201
9.9
13
Quality of Support
8.2
1,368
9.3
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
199
9.7
13
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
1,498
9.0
94
Features by Category
Building Design and Building Information Modeling (BIM)Hide 28 FeaturesShow 28 Features
8.0
474
Not enough data
Design
8.4
408
Not enough data
7.3
376
Not enough data
9.2
414
Not enough data
8.8
405
Not enough data
8.1
370
Not enough data
8.3
196
Not enough data
Collaboration
7.9
362
Not enough data
8.9
415
Not enough data
8.7
409
Not enough data
8.7
393
Not enough data
Construction
8.4
364
Not enough data
8.2
356
Not enough data
7.5
335
Not enough data
8.1
186
Not enough data
7.8
180
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.2
48
Not enough data
7.1
46
Not enough data
6.2
48
Not enough data
Common Data Environment (CDE) - Building Design and Building Information Modeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cost Estimation - Building Design and Building Information Modeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Electrical & Circuit Design - Building Design and Building Information Modeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
9.4
491
9.5
83
8.0
467
9.4
84
8.2
469
9.3
83
7.4
422
8.4
71
Edit
8.7
481
8.4
78
8.2
435
9.2
73
8.5
479
9.4
79
8.4
454
8.8
68
Collaboration
8.6
471
7.6
48
8.6
458
8.2
56
8.4
440
7.7
50
Data Management
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.8
37
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
Map Creation
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
33
Not enough data
8.7
37
Not enough data
8.7
35
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.0
35
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.2
13
Not enough data
7.4
13
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AutoCAD and Shapr3D are categorized as General-Purpose CAD
Unique Categories
AutoCAD is categorized as GIS, Building Design and Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Shapr3D has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AutoCAD
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Shapr3D
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Architecture & Planning
22.5%
Civil Engineering
10.5%
Construction
9.3%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
8.7%
Design
8.3%
Other
40.6%
Design
14.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
8.6%
Furniture
6.8%
Higher Education
5.6%
Construction
4.9%
Other
59.3%
Discussions
Can we add simulation?
4 Comments
SY
you can get your answer with AWS Classes in Pune.
https://www.sevenmentor.com/amazon-web-services-training-institute-in-pune.php
Read more
Which of the features might be useful for CAD software?
3 Comments
ZM
Photorealistic rendering techniques in AutoCAD are a way to create realistic images of 3D models. These techniques use lighting, material, and rendering...Read more
What can you do with Shapr3D?
9 Comments
SR
Due to the short learning curve and ability to create quick and dimension-accurate designs, Shapr3D becomes an extension of your imagination.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
