When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AutoCAD Plant 3D easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Tekla Structures overall.
Reviewers felt that AutoCAD Plant 3D meets the needs of their business better than Tekla Structures.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AutoCAD Plant 3D is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AutoCAD Plant 3D over Tekla Structures.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AutoCAD Plant 3D
No pricing available
Tekla Structures
No pricing available
Free Trial
AutoCAD Plant 3D
No trial information available
Tekla Structures
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
35
8.7
47
Ease of Use
8.6
35
8.3
48
Ease of Setup
8.0
11
7.4
14
Ease of Admin
8.7
10
7.6
13
Quality of Support
8.6
35
8.2
46
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Basically, you can create process flow diagrams (piping and instrumentation diagrams). Convert them to 3D piping design (e.g., pipeline layout) and even end...Read more
AutoCAD Plant 3D has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.