Users report that AutoCAD MEP excels in its drawing capabilities, with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for detailed drafting tasks, while Tekla Structures, with a score of 8.5, is noted for its strong documentation features, which some users find essential for project management.
Reviewers mention that AutoCAD MEP's dynamic updating feature, scoring 7.9, can sometimes lag behind Tekla Structures' 8.4 rating, which is praised for its real-time collaboration capabilities, allowing teams to work more efficiently on shared projects.
G2 users highlight that Tekla Structures shines in clash detection, scoring 8.5, which is crucial for avoiding costly errors during construction, whereas AutoCAD MEP's score of 7.7 indicates room for improvement in this area.
Users on G2 appreciate AutoCAD MEP's ease of use, both scoring 8.3, but reviewers mention that Tekla Structures offers a slightly better user experience in terms of setup and administration, with scores of 7.4 and 7.6 respectively.
Reviewers say that AutoCAD MEP's rendering capabilities, with a score of 8.0, are adequate for most users, but Tekla Structures' 8.3 rating indicates a more robust feature set for visualizing complex designs.
Users report that while both products have strong fabrication tools, Tekla Structures edges out with a score of 8.7 compared to AutoCAD MEP's 8.6, making it a better option for users focused on detailed construction processes.
What is the difference between AutoCAD and Autocad MEP?
1 Comment
JP
AutoCAD MEP add special custom toolbars and shortcuts that are useful for mechanical, electrical and plumbing designers/drafters. It's basically AutoCAD...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.