Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Autify and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial 1 User
Contact Us Per Year
Autify
Star Rating
(12)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial 1 User
Browse all 3 pricing plansmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that mabl excels in its Test Feedback feature, scoring 9.1, which allows for detailed insights into test failures, while Autify's feedback mechanism is less robust, leading to a score of 8.5.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's Test History functionality, rated at 9.2, provides comprehensive tracking of test runs, making it easier to identify trends over time, whereas Autify's history tracking is perceived as less intuitive, resulting in a lower score.
- G2 users highlight mabl's Customization capabilities, scoring 8.8, which allows teams to tailor tests to their specific needs, while Autify's customization options are seen as limited, leading to a score of 8.0.
- Users on G2 report that mabl's Reliability is a strong point, with a score of 9.0, indicating consistent performance during testing, whereas Autify has received mixed reviews in this area, scoring 8.5.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's Thoroughness in testing, rated at 8.8, ensures that edge cases are well-covered, while Autify's thoroughness is perceived as lacking, resulting in a score of 8.3.
- Users say that mabl's overall Ease of Use is rated at 9.0, making it user-friendly for teams, while Autify shines with a higher score of 9.6, indicating a more intuitive interface that users find easier to navigate.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Autify
14 Day Free Trial
Free Trial
1 User
Start your 14-day free trial as early as today.
Perfect for starting small
- Run tests on Chrome
- Autify Cloud Environment
- Mobile emulation
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Autify
No trial information availablemabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
8
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.6
8
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.5
8
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
8
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Autify and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing, Software Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Autify
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Venture Capital & Private Equity
10.0%
Translation and Localization
10.0%
Marketing and Advertising
10.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.0%
Other
30.0%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Autify has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
