Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AttackFlow and HCL AppScan 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
AttackFlow
Star Rating
(11)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AttackFlowHCL AppScan
Star Rating
(76)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that HCL AppScan excels in its Static Code Analysis with a score of 8.3, providing thorough insights into code vulnerabilities, while AttackFlow matches this score but lacks the same depth in user feedback.
- Reviewers mention that AttackFlow shines in Compliance Testing, achieving a high score of 9.0, which users appreciate for its robust compliance features, whereas HCL AppScan scores lower at 7.9, indicating less emphasis on compliance.
- G2 users highlight that HCL AppScan offers superior Reporting and Analytics capabilities with a score of 8.6, allowing for detailed insights into security issues, while AttackFlow's score of 8.3 suggests it may not provide the same level of detail.
- Users on G2 report that AttackFlow's Test Automation features are particularly strong, scoring 8.8, which reviewers say enhances efficiency in testing processes compared to HCL AppScan's score of 8.4.
- Reviewers mention that HCL AppScan's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.5, making it user-friendly for new adopters, while AttackFlow's score of 8.8 indicates a slightly easier setup experience, which users appreciate.
- Users say that both products have effective Manual Testing capabilities, but AttackFlow's score of 8.3 is noted as being more favorable compared to HCL AppScan's score of 7.8, suggesting a better user experience in manual testing scenarios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AttackFlow
No pricing availableHCL AppScan
HCL AppScan CodeSweep
Free
Free-to-use security tool for developers alike who need to "spell check" and fix their code, as they write it, in multiple IDEs.
- Ideal for Developers
Free Trial
AttackFlow
No trial information availableHCL AppScan
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
10
8.8
59
Ease of Use
8.2
10
8.5
62
Ease of Setup
8.8
7
8.5
31
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
31
Quality of Support
8.7
9
8.5
60
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
30
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
10
8.4
58
Features by Category
Administration
8.6
7
8.2
21
8.9
6
8.5
21
Analysis
8.3
7
8.6
22
8.3
7
7.8
22
8.3
7
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.0
22
Testing
8.1
7
7.6
21
8.3
7
7.8
21
8.8
7
8.4
20
9.0
7
7.9
21
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.1
26
Not enough data
8.2
28
Analysis
Not enough data
8.5
29
Not enough data
8.0
27
Not enough data
8.2
28
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.3
27
Testing
Not enough data
7.7
28
Not enough data
7.9
24
Not enough data
8.4
26
Not enough data
8.2
29
Not enough data
8.2
29
Not enough data
7.1
29
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AttackFlow and HCL AppScan are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
AttackFlow has no unique categories
HCL AppScan is categorized as Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AttackFlow
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
HCL AppScan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
18.2%
Retail
9.1%
Online Media
9.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
24.3%
Computer & Network Security
13.5%
Computer Software
9.5%
Automotive
8.1%
Banking
6.8%
Other
37.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
AttackFlow has no discussions with answers
Who owns AppScan?
1 Comment
Official Response from HCL AppScan
HCL AppScan is owned by HCL Software.Read more
HCL AppScan has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
