Link copied to clipboard # AttackFlow vs Checkmarx Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/attackflow/checkmarx/export.csv) AttackFlowCheckmarx[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **AttackFlow** No pricing available **Checkmarx** Free Trial **Contact Us** · SAST **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **AttackFlow** Not enough reviews yet **Checkmarx** $$$$$ Average Discount **AttackFlow** Not enough reviews yet **Checkmarx** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **AttackFlow** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Checkmarx** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **AttackFlow** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Checkmarx** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **AttackFlow** Not enough data **Checkmarx** Implementation Ease (2) User Interface (2) False Positives (1) Lacking Features (1) Integrations **AttackFlow** Not enough data **Checkmarx** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3390b4cc3d92e87d570895f7358c003/aws-lambda.jpg "Product Avatar Image") AWS Lambda ](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-lambda/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2ac0e7b10e1efb64107026cb2b241d53/azure-pipelines.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Azure Pipelines ](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-pipelines/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_816e7e27d5ac09363053c4ca43e63c5c/jenkins.png "Product Avatar Image") Jenkins ](https://www.g2.com/products/jenkins/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_30c8c0be4019fecb52bbd21b32b79b69/teamcity.png "Product Avatar Image") TeamCity ](https://www.g2.com/products/teamcity/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/integrations) Screenshots **AttackFlow** No screenshot available **Checkmarx** ![Checkmarx screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1898040/Checkmarx_One_Platform.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **AttackFlow** **8.5** /10 Based on 10 responses **Checkmarx** **8.6** /10 Based on 37 responses Ease of Use **AttackFlow** **8.2** /10 Based on 10 responses **Checkmarx** **8.5** /10 Based on 38 responses Ease of Setup **AttackFlow** **8.8** /10 Based on 7 responses **Checkmarx** **8.2** /10 Based on 24 responses Ease of Admin **AttackFlow** Not enough data **Checkmarx** **8.3** /10 Based on 18 responses Quality of Support **AttackFlow** **8.7** /10 Based on 9 responses **Checkmarx** **8.4** /10 Based on 31 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **AttackFlow** Not enough data **Checkmarx** **8.7** /10 Based on 17 responses Product Direction (% positive) **AttackFlow** **7.7** /10 Based on 10 responses **Checkmarx** **8.2** /10 Based on 33 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Static Application Security Testing (SAST) **8.5** /10 Based on 9 responses **8.4** /10 Based on 16 responses User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 27.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 36.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 36.4% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 27.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 36.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 36.4% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 23.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 25.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 51.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 23.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 25.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 51.1% **Reviewers' Industry** [![AttackFlow](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_fe5862689bb300086501a0d2aedc0ae6/attackflow.jpg "AttackFlow")](https://www.g2.com/products/attackflow/reviews) AttackFlow Information Technology and Services 18.2% Computer & Network Security 18.2% Retail 9.1% Online Media 9.1% Health, Wellness and Fitness 9.1% Other 36.4% [![Checkmarx](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ee46b61b130757d24b7633fe98e00fb6/checkmarx.svg "Checkmarx")](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/reviews) Checkmarx Computer Software 18.6% Information Technology and Services 18.6% Banking 11.6% Computer & Network Security 11.6% Automotive 4.7% Other 34.9% Alternatives **AttackFlow Alternatives** ![GitHub](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/github.png "GitHub") [ GitHub ](/products/github/reviews) ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab") [ GitLab ](/products/gitlab/reviews) ![GitGuardian](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3418843b40f7bc5982a99a0fc1b15ea6/gitguardian.svg "GitGuardian") [ GitGuardian ](/products/gitguardian/reviews) ![Aikido Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/281b7973f3fd54aeeba3bec666fa4da6/aikido-security.svg "Aikido Security") [ Aikido Security ](/products/aikido-security/reviews) **Checkmarx Alternatives** ![Veracode Application Security Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d30c215643c0b745ba4951ab20b60121/veracode-application-security-platform.svg "Veracode Application Security Platform") [ Veracode Application... ](/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews) ![SonarQube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2d6b80be24e9f51c144f780f2aa41cb3/sonarqube.svg "SonarQube") [ SonarQube ](/products/sonarqube/reviews) ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab") [ GitLab ](/products/gitlab/reviews) ![Black Duck Polaris Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/195ba70518e2390f639f5372bea2e6c0/black-duck-polaris-platform.svg "Black Duck Polaris Platform") [ Black Duck Polaris Platform ](/products/black-duck-polaris-platform/reviews) ## AttackFlow vs Checkmarx FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: November 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between Checkmarx vs AttackFlow? Checkmarx and AttackFlow share a 4.2/5 G2 rating, while Checkmarx has broader reviewer coverage and AttackFlow scores higher for setup and support. | Dimension | [Checkmarx](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/reviews) | [AttackFlow](https://www.g2.com/products/attackflow/reviews) | | --- | --- | --- | | G2 Rating (reviews) | 4.2/5 (50+ reviews) | 4.2/5 (10+ reviews) | | Largest Segment | Enterprise | | Ease of Setup score | 8.2 | 8.8 | | Quality of Support score | 8.4 | 8.7 | | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | In recent reviews, reviewers highlight vulnerability visibility, scanning coverage, and CI/CD integration. | In recent reviews, reviewers highlight vulnerability identification and risk prioritization. | ### How do the pricing models of Checkmarx and AttackFlow compare? Recent Checkmarx reviewers describe its cost as high, while an older AttackFlow review describes it as affordable. - **Checkmarx:** In recent reviews, reviewers cite relatively high licensing costs, with one startup reviewer weighing the price during evaluation. - **AttackFlow:** An older reviewer describes AttackFlow as affordable and suitable for a growing business. - **Switching considerations:** A Checkmarx reviewer reports discontinuing use after the cost was judged too high; another recent reviewer cites pricing as a reason for continued evaluation. ### What are the best alternatives to Checkmarx and AttackFlow? GitHub, Veracode Application Security Platform, and SonarQube are the top three G2-ranked alternatives shared by Checkmarx and AttackFlow. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Checkmarx](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/reviews) | 4.2/5 (50+ reviews) | Enterprise | Recent reviewers describe licensing costs as relatively high. | Recent reviewers highlight vulnerability visibility, scanning coverage, and CI/CD integration. | | [AttackFlow](https://www.g2.com/products/attackflow/reviews) | 4.2/5 (10+ reviews) | | | Recent reviewers highlight vulnerability identification and risk prioritization. | | [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) | 4.7/5 (2.4k+ reviews) | Small-Business | | | | [Veracode Application Security Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews) | 3.8/5 (20+ reviews) | | | | | [SonarQube](https://www.g2.com/products/sonarqube/reviews) | 4.4/5 (100+ reviews) | Mid-Market | | | ### Which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) features should I prioritize when comparing Checkmarx and AttackFlow? Prioritize vulnerability detection and triage, developer workflow integration, scan performance, setup effort, and remediation guidance when evaluating Checkmarx and AttackFlow. - **Vulnerability detection and triage:** Checkmarx reviewers cite broad scanning coverage and visibility into vulnerability paths; AttackFlow reviewers highlight identifying weak code areas and prioritizing risks. - **Developer workflow integration:** Recent Checkmarx reviews describe CI/CD, repository, Jira, and GitHub Actions workflows; reviewers also note GitHub Actions configuration can take effort. AttackFlow reviews describe in-development scanning and a Visual Studio extension. - **Scan performance:** Recent Checkmarx reviewers report that full scans can take longer on large projects. AttackFlow reviewers describe its scanners as swift, without a comparable recent performance concern. - **Setup effort:** Checkmarx scores 8.2 for Ease of Setup and AttackFlow scores 8.8. - **Remediation guidance:** Checkmarx reviewers value vulnerability flow details and remediation guidance; AttackFlow reviewers cite focused risk identification and potential solutions. ### What are the pros and cons of Checkmarx vs AttackFlow? Checkmarx’s headline strength is broad application-security scanning and developer workflow visibility; AttackFlow’s is focused vulnerability identification and risk prioritization. - **Checkmarx strengths:** Recent reviewers praise scanning coverage, centralized vulnerability visibility, CI/CD integration, and remediation tracking. Its all-time sentiment counts include 2 mentions for Implementation Ease and 2 for User Interface. - **Checkmarx trade-offs:** Recent reviewers cite false-positive review effort, slower scans on large projects, complex workflow configuration, and relatively high licensing costs. - **AttackFlow strengths:** Recent reviewers value identifying weak code areas and focusing remediation on pressing risks; reviewers also describe useful visualization for coordinating security work. - **AttackFlow trade-offs:** Reviewers note that attack-path representations do not show how risks can combine, and custom incident workflows can be tedious to configure. ### Is Checkmarx or AttackFlow better for small businesses? Checkmarx is the better-supported small-business fit in the supplied segment data because its largest reviewer segment is Enterprise, while AttackFlow has no supplied largest-segment designation; recent Checkmarx startup feedback flags cost as a concern. - **Checkmarx:** Its largest reviewer segment is Enterprise; a recent startup reviewer cites relatively high pricing while evaluating the product. - **AttackFlow:** An older reviewer describes it as affordable and recommends it for small, growing businesses. ### Which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) platform has better integrations? Checkmarx has the stronger documented integration signal, with recent reviewers naming multiple developer-workflow connections; AttackFlow reviews describe development-environment integration. - **Checkmarx:** Recent reviewers cite Jira, GitHub Actions, CI/CD pipelines, repositories, IDE plugins, and source-code management platforms. Jenkins is the named integration with a supplied all-time count, below the publish floor. - **AttackFlow:** Reviewers describe integration into the development environment and a Visual Studio extension. ### How do Checkmarx and AttackFlow compare on customer support? AttackFlow leads Checkmarx on Quality of Support by 0.3 points, scoring 8.7 versus 8.4. - **Checkmarx:** Recent reviewers describe support as fair or good, with one reporting helpful responses on issues and feature requests; another notes that support can be delayed. - **AttackFlow:** Reviewers describe customer support as effective, friendly, and ready to assist; its 8.7 score is 0.3 points above Checkmarx. ### Which is easier to implement, Checkmarx or AttackFlow? AttackFlow leads Checkmarx on Ease of Setup by 0.6 points, scoring 8.8 versus 8.2. - **Checkmarx:** Recent reviewers report easy initial setup, while others describe a learning phase for policy configuration and setup that can take days. - **AttackFlow:** Reviewers describe installation and deployment as manageable, though some say setup is not intuitive; its Ease of Setup score is 0.6 points higher. ## AttackFlow vs Checkmarx - Reviewers felt that Checkmarx meets the needs of their business better than AttackFlow. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AttackFlow is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Checkmarx over AttackFlow.