Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Atlar and Kyriba 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (69.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Atlar
Star Rating
(48)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 4 pricing plansKyriba
Star Rating
(98)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (69.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about KyribaSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Kyriba excels in providing a comprehensive view of financial transactions, with users appreciating the ability to easily locate payments, bank statements, and cash positions all in one place. This centralized approach enhances day-to-day usability, making it easier for finance teams to manage their operations.
- Users say that Atlar stands out for its exceptional implementation process, with many highlighting the smooth integration and proactive support from the team. Reviewers have noted that the platform is intuitive and user-friendly, which significantly eases the onboarding experience for new users.
- According to verified reviews, Kyriba's customer support is highly responsive, with users praising the team's willingness to assist with issues and improvements. This level of support is crucial for organizations that rely on timely assistance to navigate complex financial tasks.
- Reviewers mention that Atlar's ease of use is a major advantage, particularly for those who are new to treasury management systems. Users have expressed satisfaction with the platform's straightforward design, which allows for quick connections to multiple banks and efficient management of financial operations.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while Kyriba has a strong feature set, some users have experienced challenges with configuration and setup, indicating that it may require more technical knowledge compared to Atlar. This can be a barrier for teams without dedicated IT resources.
- Users report that Atlar's focus on user experience is evident in its design and functionality, with many finding it easier to navigate and utilize compared to Kyriba. This user-centric approach can lead to increased productivity and satisfaction among finance professionals.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Atlar
Connect
Contact Us
Quick bank-ERP connectivity without Atlar dashboard access. ERPs include NetSuite, MS Dynamics, and SAP.
- Bank-ERP integration
- Google Authentication (SSO)
- User Access Management
Kyriba
No pricing availableFree Trial
Atlar
Free Trial is available
Kyriba
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
47
8.7
85
Ease of Use
9.4
46
7.6
89
Ease of Setup
8.8
43
6.9
62
Ease of Admin
9.2
29
7.3
49
Quality of Support
10.0
47
8.0
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
29
8.3
49
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
47
9.3
85
Features by Category
Payment Methods
9.4
19
8.9
21
9.3
16
6.7
20
9.7
19
8.9
22
Payment Processing
9.3
18
8.8
22
9.5
19
8.7
21
9.4
21
8.3
22
9.4
18
7.5
19
9.4
16
7.3
18
9.4
17
8.2
19
9.7
21
8.5
21
Security and Compliance
Feature Not Available
7.1
17
9.7
17
7.4
15
9.2
16
8.4
18
9.9
16
8.1
16
Feature Not Available
8.6
14
10.0
6
8.3
15
Integration
9.6
17
8.1
16
9.4
15
8.1
17
9.4
16
8.1
17
Payment Types
9.8
16
7.6
15
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Enterprise Payment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Management
9.8
31
9.4
59
7.6
23
7.2
47
9.1
23
7.8
47
8.8
24
8.1
46
8.9
22
7.9
47
9.3
23
8.2
42
Risk and Compliance
8.1
9
6.7
36
Feature Not Available
7.9
38
7.9
8
7.0
36
7.9
8
6.4
36
Analytics
9.6
27
9.4
49
7.5
21
7.6
36
7.4
18
7.0
35
7.5
19
6.1
31
Banking
9.7
28
9.0
52
9.9
30
8.7
52
9.2
8
7.2
38
9.6
23
8.6
43
Integration
8.7
24
8.5
42
8.1
21
7.6
33
6.9
18
6.1
31
8.2
21
8.3
39
Financial Data Transfer
8.7
19
8.6
38
9.1
21
8.9
40
9.5
23
9.0
43
8.9
21
8.6
39
Agentic AI - Treasury Management Systems
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Cash Flow Management
9.0
17
8.9
25
9.2
17
8.3
22
9.4
19
9.1
23
Cash Flow Forecasting
9.1
18
8.7
25
8.9
14
7.6
22
9.3
14
7.7
23
9.2
13
7.9
22
Feature Not Available
6.6
18
Analytics
9.2
14
7.1
24
8.9
18
8.5
28
9.2
14
7.5
22
9.1
13
7.3
20
Financial Data Transfer
9.6
14
8.5
23
9.6
13
8.7
22
9.4
15
8.3
25
9.4
18
9.0
26
9.3
17
7.9
23
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Atlar and Kyriba are categorized as Treasury Management Systems, Cash Flow Management, and Enterprise Payment
Unique Categories
Atlar has no unique categories
Kyriba has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Atlar
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Kyriba
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
45.8%
Computer Software
6.3%
Apparel & Fashion
6.3%
Retail
4.2%
Online Media
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Commercial Real Estate
10.3%
Insurance
8.2%
Financial Services
8.2%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
7.2%
Information Technology and Services
6.2%
Other
59.8%
Discussions
Atlar has no discussions with answers
Kyriba has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
