Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Atlar and Kyriba 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ProAI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Paysafe
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Native Teams
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (68.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Atlar
Star Rating
(45)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 4 pricing plansKyriba
Star Rating
(91)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (68.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about KyribaSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Kyriba excels in "Banking Connectivity" with a score of 8.9, while Atlar shines even brighter with a perfect score of 9.8, indicating a more robust integration with banking systems.
- Reviewers mention that Atlar's "Ease of Use" is significantly higher at 9.5 compared to Kyriba's 7.6, suggesting that users find Atlar's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that Atlar offers superior "Quality of Support" with a perfect score of 10.0, while Kyriba scores 8.4, indicating that users feel more supported and valued with Atlar.
- Users on G2 note that Kyriba's "Cash Pooling" feature scores 7.6, which is lower than Atlar's impressive 9.3, suggesting that Atlar provides a more effective solution for managing pooled cash resources.
- Reviewers say that Atlar's "Automated Workflows" feature is rated at 9.0, outperforming Kyriba's 8.1, indicating that Atlar offers more efficient automation capabilities for payment processing.
- Users report that Kyriba's "Cash Flow Forecasting" capabilities, particularly in "Historical Data," score 8.7, while Atlar's score of 9.1 suggests a more comprehensive approach to forecasting cash flow trends.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Atlar
Connect
Contact Us
Quick bank-ERP connectivity without Atlar dashboard access. ERPs include NetSuite, MS Dynamics, and SAP.
- Bank-ERP integration
- Google Authentication (SSO)
- User Access Management
Kyriba
No pricing availableFree Trial
Atlar
Free Trial is available
Kyriba
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
44
8.7
78
Ease of Use
9.5
43
7.6
82
Ease of Setup
8.9
40
6.8
56
Ease of Admin
9.1
27
7.4
46
Quality of Support
10.0
44
8.0
74
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.9
27
8.4
46
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
44
9.3
78
Features by Category
Payment Methods
9.4
19
8.8
20
9.3
16
6.7
20
9.7
19
8.9
21
Payment Processing
9.3
18
8.7
21
9.5
19
8.7
21
9.4
21
8.3
21
9.4
18
7.5
19
9.4
16
7.3
18
9.4
17
8.2
19
9.7
21
8.5
21
Security and Compliance
Feature Not Available
7.1
17
9.7
17
7.4
15
9.2
16
8.4
18
9.9
16
8.1
16
Feature Not Available
8.6
14
10.0
6
8.3
15
Integration
9.6
17
8.1
16
9.4
15
8.1
17
9.4
16
8.1
17
Payment Types
9.8
16
7.6
15
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Enterprise Payment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Management
9.9
29
9.4
56
7.6
23
7.3
47
9.1
23
7.8
48
8.8
24
8.1
46
8.9
22
8.0
48
9.2
22
8.2
43
Risk and Compliance
8.1
9
6.8
37
Feature Not Available
8.0
39
7.9
8
7.1
37
7.9
8
6.5
37
Analytics
9.6
27
9.4
50
7.5
21
7.7
37
7.4
18
7.1
36
7.5
19
6.2
32
Banking
9.8
27
9.0
52
9.9
27
8.8
49
9.3
7
7.3
39
9.5
22
8.6
43
Integration
8.6
23
8.5
40
8.1
21
7.6
34
6.9
18
6.3
32
8.1
20
8.3
38
Financial Data Transfer
8.7
19
8.6
39
9.1
21
8.9
39
9.5
23
8.9
41
8.9
21
8.6
39
Agentic AI - Treasury Management Systems
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Cash Flow Management
9.0
17
8.8
24
9.2
17
8.3
22
9.4
19
9.1
23
Cash Flow Forecasting
9.1
18
8.7
25
8.9
14
7.6
22
9.3
14
7.7
23
9.2
13
7.9
22
Feature Not Available
6.6
18
Analytics
9.1
13
7.1
24
9.1
17
8.4
27
9.2
14
7.5
22
9.1
13
7.3
20
Financial Data Transfer
9.6
14
8.4
22
9.6
13
8.7
22
9.4
15
8.3
25
9.4
18
9.0
26
9.3
17
7.9
23
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Atlar and Kyriba are categorized as Treasury Management Systems, Cash Flow Management, and Enterprise Payment
Unique Categories
Atlar has no unique categories
Kyriba has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Atlar
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Kyriba
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
48.9%
Computer Software
6.7%
Apparel & Fashion
6.7%
Retail
4.4%
Online Media
4.4%
Other
28.9%
Commercial Real Estate
11.1%
Financial Services
10.0%
Insurance
8.9%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
7.8%
Utilities
5.6%
Other
56.7%
Discussions
Atlar has no discussions with answers
Kyriba has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
