Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Atlan and Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Tag Monitor
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (52.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Atlan
Star Rating
(121)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (52.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AtlanMicrosoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Atlan excels in Data Lineage with a score of 9.3, allowing for clear tracking of data flow and transformations, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management matches this with a score of 9.2, indicating strong capabilities but slightly less user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that Atlan's Ease of Setup is rated at 9.2, making it user-friendly for new adopters, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management has a lower score of 8.7, suggesting a more complex initial setup process.
- G2 users highlight Atlan's superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.3, indicating responsive and helpful customer service, compared to Microsoft Purview's score of 8.6, which, while still good, suggests room for improvement in support responsiveness.
- Users on G2 report that Atlan's Data Discovery feature shines with a score of 9.3, facilitating easier identification of data assets, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management also performs well with a score of 9.2, but lacks some of the intuitive features that Atlan offers.
- Reviewers mention that Atlan's Self-service capabilities are rated at 9.2, empowering users to manage their own data needs effectively, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management, while strong, scores slightly lower at 9.0, indicating a less flexible approach.
- Users say that Atlan's Business Glossary feature is highly rated at 9.3, providing clear definitions and context for data terms, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management's score of 8.8 suggests it offers a solid glossary but may not be as comprehensive or user-friendly as Atlan's.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Atlan
No pricing availableMicrosoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Atlan
No trial information availableMicrosoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
105
8.5
12
Ease of Use
9.0
105
8.5
12
Ease of Setup
9.2
78
8.7
9
Ease of Admin
8.9
73
8.9
9
Quality of Support
9.3
101
8.5
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
74
8.9
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
103
10.0
12
Features by Category
Data Governance
8.5
39
Not enough data
8.2
26
Not enough data
9.3
44
Not enough data
Data Preparation
9.1
44
Not enough data
7.2
27
Not enough data
6.7
24
Not enough data
6.6
23
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.1
36
Not enough data
9.2
43
Not enough data
9.3
42
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
5.9
9
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Machine Learning Data Catalog
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
6.4
29
9.4
8
7.2
32
9.0
8
7.4
34
9.3
7
7.0
31
9.2
8
Management
9.3
48
8.8
8
9.5
48
9.2
8
7.5
37
8.5
8
7.3
38
9.8
8
9.2
48
9.2
8
Compliance
8.4
33
9.4
8
8.6
37
9.0
8
8.4
34
9.8
7
6.9
27
9.2
8
Security
8.1
41
9.4
8
8.7
39
9.6
8
8.5
32
9.4
8
Data Quality
6.7
24
9.0
7
6.5
24
9.8
8
6.6
24
9.4
8
Maintainence
7.5
34
8.8
8
7.9
35
9.4
8
Generative AI
5.8
19
8.6
7
6.3
19
9.0
8
Agentic AI - Data Governance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
6.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Fabric
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.3
36
Not enough data
8.9
34
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - DataOps Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
8.4
22
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Monitoring and Management
8.5
27
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
Cloud Deployment
7.4
13
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data management
9.2
69
Not enough data
8.6
57
Not enough data
8.6
65
Not enough data
9.2
67
Not enough data
8.9
67
Not enough data
Reporting
7.3
36
Not enough data
7.4
36
Not enough data
7.2
40
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.7
21
Not enough data
6.3
21
Not enough data
Functionality
7.6
17
Not enough data
6.9
15
Not enough data
7.3
15
Not enough data
6.8
15
Not enough data
7.5
16
Not enough data
Management
7.2
20
Not enough data
7.7
20
Not enough data
7.5
18
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.4
11
Not enough data
7.0
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Atlan and Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management are categorized as Data Governance
Unique Categories
Atlan is categorized as Active Metadata Management, DataOps Platforms, Data Fabric, Machine Learning Data Catalog, and Data Quality
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Atlan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
21.5%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Computer Software
9.1%
Retail
6.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Other
47.1%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Financial Services
16.7%
Medical Practice
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Investment Banking
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Atlan has no discussions with answers
Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
