Assembla vs OpenText Application Quality Management
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Assembla easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Assembla overall.
Reviewers felt that Assembla meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Application Quality Management.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Assembla is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Assembla over OpenText Application Quality Management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Assembla
Repos
$11.50
1 Per Seat Per Month
Meet all your Subversion and Git needs, in the cloud
Can I deploy Assembla on my own AWS, Azure, GCP, or on-premise server?
1 Comment
Official Response from Assembla
Yes! For organizations with high standards around security and compliance, Assembla Enterprise Self Hosted provides a completely self-managed version of the...Read more
How can I delete file I previously updated on ticket comment ?
1 Comment
MC
Hi Cesare! Thanks for reaching out. Just to clarify, are you asking to remove a file you attached to a ticket?
To remove a file you previously attached...Read more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.