Users report that Asciidoctor excels in cross-platform support with a score of 9.8, making it a preferred choice for teams working across different operating systems, while Oxygen XML Editor, with a score of 7.6, has limited cross-platform capabilities.
Reviewers mention that Asciidoctor's extensibility is a standout feature, scoring 9.0, allowing users to easily customize and enhance their workflows, whereas Oxygen XML Editor, scoring 7.0, has fewer options for extensibility.
G2 users highlight that Oxygen XML Editor offers superior find and replace functionality, scoring 9.3, which is particularly beneficial for large documents, while Asciidoctor's score of 8.3 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
Users on G2 report that both products have similar scores for ease of use at 8.7, but reviewers mention that Asciidoctor's interface is more intuitive for new users, making it easier to get started.
Reviewers say that Oxygen XML Editor shines in quality of support with a score of 8.6, often citing responsive customer service, while Asciidoctor's score of 7.9 suggests there may be room for improvement in support responsiveness.
Users report that collaborative editing is a strong point for Asciidoctor, scoring 8.6, which is beneficial for teams, while Oxygen XML Editor's score of 6.1 indicates it may not support collaborative workflows as effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Asciidoctor
No pricing available
Oxygen XML Editor
No pricing available
Free Trial
Asciidoctor
No trial information available
Oxygen XML Editor
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
9.4
22
Ease of Use
8.7
9
8.7
23
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.2
10
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.1
9
Quality of Support
7.9
8
8.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.