When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN overall.
Aruba EdgeConnect and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Aruba EdgeConnect over Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aruba EdgeConnect
No pricing available
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
No pricing available
Free Trial
Aruba EdgeConnect
No trial information available
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
9
8.9
56
Ease of Use
8.5
9
9.1
58
Ease of Setup
7.7
10
9.2
44
Ease of Admin
8.1
9
8.9
42
Quality of Support
8.3
9
8.9
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
9
9.3
43
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
9
7.7
55
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aruba EdgeConnect
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Aruba EdgeConnect and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN are categorized as SD-WAN
Cisco SDWAN is used for Software Defined Networking
Centralized management
Zero Touch provisioning
Link agnostic
Load Balancing and sharing...Read more
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.