Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Sonar Software and BrowserStack 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
All in One Accessibility
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (80.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
$0.00 1 user plan
Arovy
Star Rating
(90)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (80.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Browse all 3 pricing plansBrowserStack
Star Rating
(2,479)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
Free Trial is available
Browse all 32 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that BrowserStack excels in cross-browser testing, allowing developers to test their applications on a wide range of browsers and devices, which is crucial for ensuring compatibility. In contrast, Sonar focuses more on code quality analysis, providing detailed insights into code vulnerabilities and maintainability.
- Reviewers mention that BrowserStack's real-time testing capabilities are a standout feature, enabling instant feedback during the development process. On the other hand, users say that Sonar's automated code review features help teams maintain high coding standards, but may not provide the same immediacy in testing as BrowserStack.
- G2 users highlight BrowserStack's ease of use with a rating of 8.9, making it accessible for teams of all sizes, while Sonar's higher ease of setup rating of 9.5 suggests that it may require more initial configuration but ultimately offers a more robust setup for ongoing code quality management.
- Users on G2 report that BrowserStack's customer support is rated at 8.7, which is satisfactory, but Sonar shines with a remarkable support rating of 9.8, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team, which can be critical for teams needing quick resolutions.
- Reviewers mention that BrowserStack's test variety is rated at 8.5, providing a good range of testing options, while Sonar's focus on test feedback and test history with ratings of 8.6 and 8.5 respectively, allows for better tracking of code changes and their impacts over time.
- Users say that BrowserStack's integration capabilities are rated at 7.6, which may limit its flexibility with other tools, whereas Sonar's integration rating of 8.4 indicates a more seamless connection with various development environments, enhancing overall workflow efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arovy
Standard
Free Trial
Get started with straightforward documentation.
- 1 Salesforce organization
- Dependency mapping
- Initiative management
BrowserStack
Free Trial
$0.00
1 user plan
- Instant Access to Real Devices
- 30 mins each of interactive browser and mobile app testing
- 100 mins of automated browser testing
Free Trial
Arovy
Free Trial is available
BrowserStack
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
53
8.8
2,209
Ease of Use
9.4
53
8.9
2,269
Ease of Setup
9.5
36
8.9
1,274
Ease of Admin
9.3
39
8.7
545
Quality of Support
9.8
46
8.7
1,883
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
38
8.8
512
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
43
9.3
2,222
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Governance
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.7
115
Not enough data
7.7
112
Not enough data
8.4
114
Reporting
Not enough data
8.0
111
Functionality
Not enough data
8.5
272
Not enough data
8.4
267
Not enough data
8.7
265
Management
Not enough data
8.4
270
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
266
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
1088
Not enough data
8.7
1075
Not enough data
8.8
1084
Management
Not enough data
8.4
1070
Not enough data
8.3
1033
Not enough data
8.4
1049
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
126
Not enough data
8.4
127
Automation
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
124
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.2
120
Reporting
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
8.4
124
Not enough data
8.3
125
Not enough data
8.2
119
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Tools
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
7.5
14
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
866
Not enough data
8.6
859
Not enough data
8.2
844
Not enough data
8.5
849
Automation
Not enough data
8.4
833
Not enough data
8.5
844
Not enough data
8.5
838
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
7.6
45
Not enough data
7.4
46
Not enough data
7.5
45
App Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Spend Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - SaaS Management Platforms (SMP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.6
129
Not enough data
7.5
128
Not enough data
7.4
128
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
7.6
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.8
20
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
7.3
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.6
20
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
Communication
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Procedural
9.5
7
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Arovy and BrowserStack are categorized as Test Management and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Arovy is categorized as Requirements Management, SaaS Management Platforms (SMP), Salesforce AppExchange Apps, and Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
BrowserStack is categorized as Load Testing Tools, Mobile App Testing, Automation Testing, Digital Accessibility Platforms, Digital Accessibility Tools, and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Arovy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
BrowserStack
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
37.5%
Information Technology and Services
26.1%
Marketing and Advertising
4.5%
Internet
4.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Other
22.7%
Computer Software
22.8%
Information Technology and Services
20.3%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Retail
2.7%
Other
44.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Arovy has no discussions with answers
What are the benefits of automating a test case?
7 Comments
DD
It helps to reduce the manual testing efforts which ultimately reduces the testing resource and budget.Read more
What can BrowserStack do?
4 Comments
TN
BrowserStack is a cloud-based web and mobile testing platform that enables users to test their websites and apps on real browsers and mobile devices. It...Read more
Which of the following features are supported by BrowserStack automate ?*?
4 Comments
DD
Web/App Automate
Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
