Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Ares Commander and AutoCAD 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Higharc
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (46.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$350.00 1 user Per Year
$2940/2 years
Ares Commander
Star Rating
(18)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$350.00 1 user Per Year
Browse all 8 pricing plansAutoCAD
Star Rating
(1,863)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$2940/2 years
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that AutoCAD excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Ares Commander. Users appreciate its robust features for complex tasks, such as real-time error checking and BOM generation, which are particularly beneficial for professionals in engineering fields.
- Users say that Ares Commander offers a cost-effective solution for basic 2D design needs, making it an attractive option for small businesses. Reviewers highlight its user-friendly interface and productivity tools, such as the Voice Note feature, which enhances team collaboration.
- According to verified reviews, AutoCAD's extensive customization options and support for scripting languages like Lisp are praised by users who require advanced functionalities for 3D design. This flexibility allows for greater efficiency and error reduction in complex projects.
- Reviewers mention that Ares Commander shines in terms of support quality, with users noting prompt and accessible assistance. This level of support can be crucial for teams that need quick resolutions to technical issues, enhancing their overall experience with the software.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while AutoCAD has a steeper entry-level price, its comprehensive feature set and higher satisfaction ratings make it a worthwhile investment for businesses that require advanced CAD capabilities. Users find the initial setup process to be straightforward, which helps in getting teams up and running quickly.
- Users report that Ares Commander, while effective for basic tasks, may not meet the needs of users looking for more advanced modeling and rendering capabilities. This limitation could be a deciding factor for professionals who rely on high-quality visual outputs in their work.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ares Commander
Annual Plan for the ARES Trinity of CAD software
$350.00
1 user Per Year
ARES Commander + ARES Touch + ARES Kudo for 1 year and a same user, including all upgrades and email support during the term.
- ARES Commander for Windows, macOS and Linux - for 1 year
- ARES Kudo - Online CAD (runs in your Internet browser) - for 1 year
- ARES Touch - Mobile CAD for iOS and Android - for 1 year
AutoCAD
2 Year Subscription
$2940
/2 years
Ideal for businesses that want consistent long-term pricing.
- Access to the latest software releases
- 1-on-1 online support
- Includes AutoCAD Mobile App
Free Trial
Ares Commander
Free Trial is available
AutoCAD
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
15
8.8
1,526
Ease of Use
9.6
15
8.3
1,531
Ease of Setup
9.3
12
8.2
292
Ease of Admin
9.2
12
8.0
201
Quality of Support
9.8
15
8.2
1,372
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
12
8.5
199
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
15
8.0
1,502
Features by Category
Building Design and Building Information Modeling (BIM)Hide 28 FeaturesShow 28 Features
Not enough data
8.0
475
Design
Not enough data
8.4
409
Not enough data
7.3
377
Not enough data
9.2
415
Not enough data
8.8
406
Not enough data
8.2
371
Not enough data
8.3
197
Collaboration
Not enough data
7.9
363
Not enough data
8.9
416
Not enough data
8.7
410
Not enough data
8.7
394
Construction
Not enough data
8.4
365
Not enough data
8.2
357
Not enough data
7.5
335
Not enough data
8.1
186
Not enough data
7.8
180
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.2
48
Not enough data
7.1
46
Not enough data
6.2
48
Common Data Environment (CDE) - Building Design and Building Information Modeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cost Estimation - Building Design and Building Information Modeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Electrical & Circuit Design - Building Design and Building Information Modeling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
9.3
15
9.4
495
7.9
12
8.0
469
8.5
12
8.2
469
7.4
12
7.4
423
Edit
8.4
15
8.7
483
8.8
13
8.2
436
9.2
14
8.5
480
8.9
14
8.4
455
Collaboration
8.9
15
8.6
473
8.6
14
8.6
461
7.7
13
8.4
441
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.8
37
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
38
Map Creation
Not enough data
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
33
Not enough data
8.7
37
Not enough data
8.7
35
Analysis
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.0
35
Not enough data
8.1
30
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
7.4
13
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.2
14
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Ares Commander and AutoCAD are categorized as General-Purpose CAD
Unique Categories
Ares Commander has no unique categories
AutoCAD is categorized as GIS, Building Design and Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Ares Commander
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
AutoCAD
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Consulting
16.7%
Architecture & Planning
16.7%
Design
11.1%
Manufacturing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
44.4%
Architecture & Planning
22.5%
Civil Engineering
10.5%
Construction
9.3%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
8.8%
Design
8.3%
Other
40.7%
Discussions
Ares Commander has no discussions with answers
Can we add simulation?
4 Comments
SY
you can get your answer with AWS Classes in Pune.
https://www.sevenmentor.com/amazon-web-services-training-institute-in-pune.php
Read more
Which of the features might be useful for CAD software?
3 Comments
ZM
Photorealistic rendering techniques in AutoCAD are a way to create realistic images of 3D models. These techniques use lighting, material, and rendering...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
