Compare Arctic Wolf and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (69.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Arctic Wolf
Star Rating
(276)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (69.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Arctic WolfMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Arctic Wolf excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. Users appreciate Arctic Wolf's proactive approach, describing it as an extension of their team that provides hands-on support and tools for managing security effectively.
- Users say that Arctic Wolf's implementation process is smooth and intuitive, with many highlighting the effectiveness of the Concierge Security Team in identifying and closing security gaps. In contrast, while Microsoft Defender is noted for its low resource consumption, some users feel it lacks the same level of personalized support.
- Reviewers mention that Arctic Wolf provides exceptional visibility into their environments, which enhances awareness of potential vulnerabilities. This feature is particularly praised, as it allows teams to manage data flow proactively, unlike Microsoft Defender, which is often seen as more reactive in its approach.
- According to verified reviews, Arctic Wolf scores higher in ease of use and setup, with users finding the platform user-friendly and straightforward. Microsoft Defender, while easy to use, is sometimes perceived as less comprehensive in its functionality, which may affect user experience.
- Users highlight the quality of support from Arctic Wolf, with many expressing satisfaction with the ongoing partnership and assistance they receive. In comparison, while Microsoft Defender offers solid protection, some users feel that its support could be more responsive and tailored to their specific needs.
- G2 reviewers note that Arctic Wolf's reporting and risk prioritization features are particularly strong, allowing teams to effectively manage vulnerabilities. Microsoft Defender, while effective for malware detection, may not provide the same depth of insights, which can be crucial for organizations looking to enhance their security posture.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arctic Wolf
No pricing availableMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Arctic Wolf
No trial information availableMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.4
217
8.5
29
Ease of Use
9.1
221
8.7
29
Ease of Setup
9.0
181
8.2
13
Ease of Admin
9.1
172
9.0
13
Quality of Support
9.4
212
8.8
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
177
8.6
14
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
207
9.2
31
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
9.6
75
8.9
24
9.5
76
8.7
24
9.6
75
8.8
23
Vulnerability Assesment
9.6
74
8.7
24
9.6
74
8.8
23
9.4
71
8.6
22
9.1
75
8.7
23
Automation
8.6
67
8.4
22
8.9
65
8.5
21
8.7
71
8.6
23
9.0
64
8.8
20
Assessment
9.6
55
Not enough data
9.5
54
Not enough data
9.5
54
Not enough data
Training
9.3
52
Not enough data
9.2
54
Not enough data
8.6
48
Not enough data
Administration
9.6
56
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.2
47
Not enough data
9.4
55
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Features
9.7
83
Not enough data
9.5
84
Not enough data
8.1
81
Not enough data
9.1
82
Not enough data
9.4
84
Not enough data
8.4
84
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Capabilities
8.3
82
Not enough data
9.0
82
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Services - Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Vulnerability Prevention
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud Detection and Response (CDR)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Services - Cloud Detection and Response (CDR)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Arctic Wolf and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Arctic Wolf is categorized as Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR), Security Awareness Training, Cloud Detection and Response (CDR), and Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Arctic Wolf
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Hospital & Health Care
7.0%
Financial Services
5.9%
Manufacturing
5.5%
Information Technology and Services
5.1%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
72.1%
Computer & Network Security
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Retail
6.3%
Computer Software
6.3%
Higher Education
6.3%
Other
53.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is arctic wolf software?
2 Comments
SP
risk and risk monitoring software placed at the company's endpoints, and consolidated in easy to consume online portal dashboards.Read more
What is the best way to secure remote endpoint devices?
1 Comment
Official Response from Arctic Wolf
Hello Dave, may we follow up with you personally to share additional information? Please let me know the best way to reach you. Cheers, Liz C, Customer...Read more
What are the functions of Arctic Wolf?
1 Comment
AW
Arctic Wolf solutions include Arctic Wolf® Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Managed Risk, Managed Cloud Monitoring and Managed Security Awareness —each...Read more
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
