When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Synology Active Backup Suite easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Synology Active Backup Suite overall.
Arcserve UDP (Unified Data Protection) is a comprehensive data backup and recovery solution that offers a range of advanced features for protecting critical business data Like Unified Management,Global Deduplication,Instant VM Recovery,High...
I dislike the maintenance renewal. I think they over charge. I'm a previous backup exec user so I would prefer seeing similar functionality. I find Arcserve not as intuitive as backup exec. Backup exec had many more features than arcserve.
I was able to backup all my office Servers (Linux Suse and Windows Server 2022), my Virtual servers also all of my client computers and laptops running (Windows 7,8,8.1,10,11) It can back up Linux/Windows Servers, windows Computers, Other NAS, File...
When I was new to linux I accidentally dumped a directory. > 100k files lost! I had to buy other s'ware to recover, still not out of the woods, as all 'filenames' were irretreivably separated from the files contents. The backup was *WORTHLESS*.
Arcserve UDP (Unified Data Protection) is a comprehensive data backup and recovery solution that offers a range of advanced features for protecting critical business data Like Unified Management,Global Deduplication,Instant VM Recovery,High...
I was able to backup all my office Servers (Linux Suse and Windows Server 2022), my Virtual servers also all of my client computers and laptops running (Windows 7,8,8.1,10,11) It can back up Linux/Windows Servers, windows Computers, Other NAS, File...
I dislike the maintenance renewal. I think they over charge. I'm a previous backup exec user so I would prefer seeing similar functionality. I find Arcserve not as intuitive as backup exec. Backup exec had many more features than arcserve.
When I was new to linux I accidentally dumped a directory. > 100k files lost! I had to buy other s'ware to recover, still not out of the woods, as all 'filenames' were irretreivably separated from the files contents. The backup was *WORTHLESS*.