When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Manjaro easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Manjaro overall.
Arch and Manjaro both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Manjaro is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Arch over Manjaro.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arch
No pricing available
Manjaro
No pricing available
Free Trial
Arch
No trial information available
Manjaro
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
28
9.3
47
Ease of Use
7.0
29
9.0
49
Ease of Setup
6.0
17
8.8
16
Ease of Admin
8.0
9
8.8
12
Quality of Support
8.1
26
8.4
41
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
NO Arch Linux, as a rolling release distribution, utilizes its own package management system called "pacman" (Package Manager) rather than relying on either...Read more
Definitively, Manjaro the best from two worlds. Stability and rolling release benefitsRead more
Does Manjaro have a software center?
1 Comment
MK
Yes, Manjaro Linux does have a software center. The software center in Manjaro is called Pamac, which is a graphical front-end for the pacman package...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.