When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Manjaro easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.
Arch and Manjaro both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Manjaro is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Arch over Manjaro.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arch
No pricing available
Manjaro
No pricing available
Free Trial
Arch
No trial information available
Manjaro
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
24
9.3
47
Ease of Use
6.7
25
9.0
49
Ease of Setup
5.4
13
8.8
16
Ease of Admin
7.9
8
8.8
12
Quality of Support
7.8
22
8.4
41
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Arch Linux is one of the lightest Linux distribution available in the market.Read more
Does Arch use RPM or Deb?
1 Comment
HC
NO Arch Linux, as a rolling release distribution, utilizes its own package management system called "pacman" (Package Manager) rather than relying on either...Read more
Yes, Manjaro Linux does have a software center. The software center in Manjaro is called Pamac, which is a graphical front-end for the pacman package...Read more
Is Manjaro better than Ubuntu?
1 Comment
JL
Definitively, Manjaro the best from two worlds. Stability and rolling release benefitsRead more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.