When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Linux Mint easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Arch overall.
Reviewers felt that Arch meets the needs of their business better than Linux Mint.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Linux Mint is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Arch over Linux Mint.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arch
No pricing available
Linux Mint
No pricing available
Free Trial
Arch
No trial information available
Linux Mint
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
28
8.9
144
Ease of Use
7.0
29
9.0
143
Ease of Setup
6.0
17
9.1
61
Ease of Admin
8.0
9
8.7
37
Quality of Support
8.1
26
8.2
136
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
NO Arch Linux, as a rolling release distribution, utilizes its own package management system called "pacman" (Package Manager) rather than relying on either...Read more
Very well, It supports older hardware as well as newer. Pleasant experience while coding...Read more
Is Linux Mint any good?
1 Comment
PL
For me it is the best distribution for office.Read more
What is Linux Mint used for?
1 Comment
GL
Linux Mint is an operating system based on the Ubuntu and Debian distributions, which provides versions with the main current desktops (Cinnamon, MATE, KDE,...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.