Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ArcGIS Field Maps and Bluebeam 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
InSite Elevation
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$260.00 1 User Per Year
ArcGIS Field Maps
Star Rating
(52)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ArcGIS Field MapsBluebeam
Star Rating
(442)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$260.00 1 User Per Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Bluebeam Revu excels in document management with a high score of 9.1, particularly highlighting its robust versioning and centralized platform features, which allow for seamless collaboration and tracking of changes. In contrast, ArcGIS Field Maps, while effective, scores lower in this area, indicating that users may find its document management capabilities less comprehensive.
- Reviewers mention that Bluebeam Revu's reporting and analytics features, scoring 7.7, provide detailed insights that are crucial for project management. Users appreciate the ability to generate customized reports, whereas ArcGIS Field Maps, with a lower score in this category, may not offer the same level of depth in analytics, which could impact decision-making.
- G2 users highlight Bluebeam Revu's superior ease of setup with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to get started quickly. In comparison, ArcGIS Field Maps has a lower ease of setup score of 7.6, suggesting that users may face more challenges during initial implementation.
- Users on G2 report that Bluebeam Revu's collaboration features, particularly its action history and messaging capabilities, score impressively at 9.0, facilitating effective communication among team members. ArcGIS Field Maps, while functional, scores lower in messaging and communication, which may hinder real-time collaboration.
- Reviewers mention that Bluebeam Revu's integration with third-party inspection software is rated at 8.3, allowing for enhanced functionality and flexibility in workflows. In contrast, ArcGIS Field Maps does not emphasize this integration as strongly, which could limit its adaptability in certain project environments.
- Users say that Bluebeam Revu's optical character recognition (OCR) technology, scoring 8.5, significantly enhances document accessibility and usability, making it easier to work with scanned documents. ArcGIS Field Maps, while offering valuable features, does not highlight OCR technology to the same extent, which may affect users who rely on digitizing paper documents.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ArcGIS Field Maps
No pricing availableBluebeam
Basics
$260.00
1 User Per Year
For simple markups, document management and collaboration.
- PDF creation, viewing, editing and markups
- Measure length and area (no perimeter)
- Participate in Studio collaborations
Free Trial
ArcGIS Field Maps
No trial information availableBluebeam
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
37
9.2
366
Ease of Use
8.5
38
8.4
370
Ease of Setup
7.6
24
8.4
86
Ease of Admin
7.4
24
7.7
55
Quality of Support
7.5
31
8.4
285
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
21
8.2
53
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
36
8.6
355
Features by Category
Documentation
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
8.6
32
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
7.9
30
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
7.8
28
Not enough data
7.8
24
Document Management
Not enough data
8.8
76
Not enough data
8.9
77
Not enough data
9.1
85
Not enough data
8.3
65
Not enough data
8.7
70
Site Management
Not enough data
8.4
62
Not enough data
7.9
57
Data Gathering
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
7.8
31
Not enough data
8.4
38
Bid Generation
Not enough data
9.0
42
Not enough data
8.2
29
Not enough data
9.1
34
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Before the Job
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
6.0
5
On the Job
Not enough data
6.4
6
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
6.7
5
After the Job
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.1
7
Agentic AI - Field Service Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autodesk Construction Cloud Integration PartnersHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Autodesk Construction Cloud Integration Partners
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ArcGIS Field Maps and Bluebeam are categorized as Field Service Management
Unique Categories
ArcGIS Field Maps has no unique categories
Bluebeam is categorized as Takeoff, Construction Drawing Management, Punch List, and Autodesk Construction Cloud Integration Partners
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ArcGIS Field Maps
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Bluebeam
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Utilities
19.1%
Government Administration
14.9%
Environmental Services
12.8%
Non-Profit Organization Management
8.5%
Research
6.4%
Other
38.3%
Construction
41.8%
Architecture & Planning
22.4%
Civil Engineering
11.2%
Design
6.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
4.0%
Other
14.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
ArcGIS Field Maps has no discussions with answers
What are the differences between Revu Standard, CAD and eXtreme®?
1 Comment
Official Response from Bluebeam
With Revu® Standard, you have access to a complete set of markup, editing and collaboration features, as well as plugins for Microsoft® Office and the...Read more
Can I transfer Revu from one computer to another?
1 Comment
Official Response from Bluebeam
Yes. For more information about transferring your license of Revu to another computer, please read ...Read more
What operating system does Revu run on?
1 Comment
Official Response from Bluebeam
All editions of Revu run on Windows®.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
