Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ArcGIS CityEngine and CityCAD 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Alteryx
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
IPinfo
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (77.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00 With One-Time Purchase
ArcGIS CityEngine
Star Rating
(22)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ArcGIS CityEngineCityCAD
Star Rating
(10)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (77.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 With One-Time Purchase
Learn more about CityCADSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ArcGIS CityEngine excels in 3D modeling and rendering, with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for users focused on high-quality visual outputs. In contrast, CityCAD, while strong in 3D modeling, does not match this level of performance, leading some users to feel it lacks the same depth in visual fidelity.
- Reviewers mention that ArcGIS CityEngine's drawing capabilities are rated at 9.7, highlighting its robust tools for creating detailed designs. CityCAD, however, has received mixed feedback on its drawing features, with some users finding them less intuitive and versatile.
- G2 users appreciate the quality of support provided by CityCAD, which has a higher rating of 8.9 compared to ArcGIS CityEngine's 8.4. This difference suggests that users of CityCAD may feel more supported in their software journey, particularly when troubleshooting or seeking guidance.
- Users on G2 indicate that ArcGIS CityEngine's predictive analysis features are particularly strong, allowing for advanced spatial analysis that some users find essential for urban planning. CityCAD, while offering analysis tools, does not seem to provide the same level of sophistication, leading to a perception of it being less capable in this area.
- Reviewers say that the ease of use for both products is comparable, with ArcGIS CityEngine scoring 8.8 and CityCAD at 8.6. However, some users of CityCAD have noted a steeper learning curve, which may impact new users trying to get up to speed quickly.
- Users report that ArcGIS CityEngine's template library is extensive, providing a wealth of resources for users to draw from, while CityCAD's library is perceived as more limited, which can hinder users looking for diverse design inspirations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ArcGIS CityEngine
No pricing availableCityCAD
Urbanist Licence
$0.00
With One-Time Purchase
A flexible ongoing 2-year renewable subscription for commercial or non-commercial use
- Quick conceptual city information modelling tool
- Built in help tutorials
- Access to online library - click to place buildings and other urban features
Free Trial
ArcGIS CityEngine
Free Trial is available
CityCAD
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
16
8.6
7
Ease of Use
8.8
16
8.6
7
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.4
16
8.9
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
17
7.7
5
Features by Category
Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Self Service
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advanced Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Move
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Store & Manage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Plan
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Design
9.4
12
Not enough data
9.4
12
Not enough data
9.7
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
Construction
8.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Engineering
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cartography
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Plan
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ArcGIS CityEngine and CityCAD are categorized as Urban Planning and Design
Unique Categories
ArcGIS CityEngine is categorized as Civil Engineering Design and 3D Modeling
CityCAD is categorized as Location Intelligence
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ArcGIS CityEngine
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
CityCAD
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.0%
Higher Education
15.0%
Government Administration
15.0%
Architecture & Planning
15.0%
Construction
10.0%
Other
30.0%
Architecture & Planning
22.2%
Consulting
11.1%
Retail
11.1%
Financial Services
11.1%
Construction
11.1%
Other
33.3%
Discussions
What is CityEngine?
1 Comment
Official Response from ArcGIS CityEngine
CityEngine is a desktop application that provides unique interactive design and procedural modeling capabilities for the efficient creation of 3D cities and...Read more
Who uses CityEngine?
1 Comment
Official Response from ArcGIS CityEngine
CityEngine is used by professionals in the following industries:
Urban planning, design, and development (architectural visualization and local...Read more
Can CityEngine export 3D GIS data to Unity or other VR/AR visualization engines?
1 Comment
Official Response from ArcGIS CityEngine
Yes. CityEngine is well suited to export your 3D GIS data or city models to Unity, the tool of choice for developing Virtual Reality applications (for...Read more
CityCAD has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
