Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ArcGIS API for JavaScript and PHPRunner 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Stacklist
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
ArcGIS API for JavaScript
Star Rating
(23)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ArcGIS API for JavaScriptPHPRunner
Star Rating
(11)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PHPRunnerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the ArcGIS API for JavaScript excels in its mapping capabilities, particularly with features like the "3D Scene Viewer" which allows for immersive visualizations, while PHPRunner is noted for its strong database integration and ease of creating web applications quickly.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for ArcGIS API for JavaScript is rated higher (8.6) compared to PHPRunner (7.7), indicating that users find more responsive and helpful assistance when using ArcGIS.
- G2 users highlight that ArcGIS API for JavaScript has a better score in meeting requirements (8.5) than PHPRunner (7.7), suggesting that it is more effective in fulfilling user needs for complex geospatial tasks.
- Users on G2 report that while both products have a similar ease of use rating, PHPRunner (8.8) slightly edges out ArcGIS API for JavaScript (8.5), making it a more user-friendly option for those less familiar with coding.
- Reviewers say that the product direction for ArcGIS API for JavaScript is rated exceptionally high (10.0), indicating strong confidence in its future development and feature enhancements, whereas PHPRunner's score (8.3) suggests some uncertainty among users about its long-term roadmap.
- Users report that the entry-level pricing for PHPRunner is more accessible for small businesses, which is reflected in its largest market segment, while ArcGIS API for JavaScript is primarily favored by enterprise users, making it less approachable for smaller organizations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ArcGIS API for JavaScript
No pricing availablePHPRunner
No pricing availableFree Trial
ArcGIS API for JavaScript
No trial information availablePHPRunner
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
13
7.7
8
Ease of Use
8.5
13
8.8
8
Ease of Setup
8.1
8
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
13
7.7
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
8
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
13
8.3
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ArcGIS API for JavaScript and PHPRunner are categorized as Other Development
Unique Categories
ArcGIS API for JavaScript has no unique categories
PHPRunner has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ArcGIS API for JavaScript
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PHPRunner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Government Administration
22.2%
Utilities
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Environmental Services
11.1%
Computer Software
11.1%
Other
27.8%
Marketing and Advertising
18.2%
Government Administration
18.2%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Real Estate
9.1%
Performing Arts
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Discussions
ArcGIS API for JavaScript has no discussions with answers
PHPRunner has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
