When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Oxygen XML Editor easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Oxygen XML Editor overall.
Reviewers felt that Oxygen XML Editor meets the needs of their business better than Arbortext Editor.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Oxygen XML Editor is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Oxygen XML Editor over Arbortext Editor.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arbortext Editor
No pricing available
Oxygen XML Editor
No pricing available
Free Trial
Arbortext Editor
No trial information available
Oxygen XML Editor
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
17
9.4
22
Ease of Use
7.7
17
8.7
23
Ease of Setup
7.8
10
9.2
10
Ease of Admin
7.5
10
9.1
9
Quality of Support
7.4
14
8.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.